Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Teachers are the pillars of education. They have responsibility of imparting knowledge to students. While some may argue that teacher’s salary should be based on the student’s success, they ignore the fact that teachers cannot solely make a student progress in life. Students have to be persevering and go further from where the teacher’s role stops.
To begin with, students are more responsible for their academics than teachers. Teachers can only do their best to teach students and the rest is upon students. They need to revise the concepts and understand them clearly. For instance, school conduct extra classes before exams for better preparation of the students. In this way, teachers are making diligent efforts on their part. If the students rely only on the teacher and perform poorly, then teacher is not responsible for their bad performance. Thus, teacher’s salary should be based on the duties performed, not the student’s academics.
Furthermore, teachers do not completely have the freedom to decide the time table of the students. Sometimes, a lot of syllabus is left and exams are near. However, teachers have to somehow teach in the specific time given to them.
Some may argue that teachers have the onus of student’s success. Parents send their children to school and college thinking that this will lead to their children’s success. If a student performs well in academics, teachers are also applauded. But when students do not succeed, it can be because of their own reckless attitude.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-09 | batterylow_123 | 30 | view |
| 2024-03-03 | LauraTing | 54 | view |
| 2023-08-30 | tomlee0205 | 67 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | truonval | 80 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | omkarraj | 66 | view |
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 50
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 50
- The following recommendation was made by the president and administrative staff of Grove College a private institution to the college s governing committee We recommend that Grove College preserve its century old tradition of all female education rather t 50
- edce
- In most professions and academic fields imagination is more important than knowledge Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 110, Rule ID: A_LOT_OF_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun syllabus seems to be countable; consider using: 'a lot of syllabi', 'a lot of syllabuses'.
Suggestion: a lot of syllabi; a lot of syllabuses
... time table of the students. Sometimes, a lot of syllabus is left and exams are near. However, te...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...specific time given to them. Some may argue that teachers have the onus of student’...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, then, thus, well, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 58.6224719101 51% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1283.0 2235.4752809 57% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 246.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21544715447 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76797032613 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 215.323595506 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548780487805 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 704.065955056 54% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 23.0359550562 56% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.6555210891 60.3974514979 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 71.2777777778 118.986275619 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 13.6666666667 23.4991977007 58% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.44444444444 5.21951772744 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.233376627152 0.243740707755 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0810104672691 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620547254716 0.0758088955206 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142235747701 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773077668935 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 48.8420337079 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 12.4 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.07 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 100.480337079 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 11.2143820225 64% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.