The prompt recommends that teachers’ salaries should be driven by their work product which is students’ academic performance in this scenario. In my opinion, I strongly agree with this prompt for these reasons.
To begin, Students’ academic performance is directly proportional to the teaching skill of teachers and we should respect their skills and give them salaries according to their results on students. For instance, if we got a teacher who has profound knowledge but failed to deliver in class, that would be harmful to students’ careers and also to the academic institute. So, it would be worthless to give them the same salaries as compared to those teachers having the best delivery and teaching skills. It will be unfair for erudite and adroit teachers. We can get a lot of examples of tuition culture in Nepal, where students pay more amount of money to get the best teacher and to be guided by them. Whereas tuition centers of those teachers whose past results on students’ performance are poor are getting shut down. This illustrates that even if the individual student prefers to give more payment to deserving teachers, then why should the institute not provide better salaries for better teachers and reduced salaries for bad teachers?
Secondly, Competition among teachers helps students to grow their academic performance. If we provide more salaries to those teachers who have better results on students’ performance, they would be more euphoric and moreover, they give their best to students. And if we provide low salaries to those teachers who have worse results, they would question themselves and try to improve their skills to make better students’ academic performance. For instance, In most private schools in Nepal, There is a practice of evaluating the performance index of teachers which is solely based on the academic performance of students under the supervision of parents committee. And evaluation leads to salary plus minus grade. This kind of evaluation and policy gives the opportunity for teachers to make themself serious and motivated with regard to students’ academic performances. This kind of impartiality over salaries improves students’ academic performance.
Of course, some argue that teachers’ salaries should be constant and that students’ academic performances are not solely dependent on teachers. However, I want to clarify that, it’s the teacher who should motivate students and make them priceless statues from raw clay. And concerning constant salary, here is one example, there are fixed salaries for teachers in government schools of Nepal, and we are well-known for the poor academic performance of their students. Fixed salary makes the teacher feel secure about their financial situation and does not seem to give any serious care to students. This clearly indicates that fixed salary is constantly deteriorating the motives and skill of teachers which directly affect the student’s academic performance.
So, for better students' future, teachers' salaries should be according to their work.
- The following appeared in a memo from the Board of Directors of Butler Manufacturing quot During the past year workers at Butler Manufacturing reported 30 percent more on the job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries where the work shifts 63
- From a letter to the editor of a city newspaper One recent research study has indicated that many adolescents need more sleep than they are getting and another study has shown that many high school students in our city are actually dissatisfied with th 53
- It is possible to pass laws that control or place limits on people s behavior but legislation cannot reform human nature Laws cannot change what is in people s hearts and minds 50
- The following was written as a part of an application for a small business loan by a group of developers in the city of Monroe A jazz music club in Monroe would be a tremendously profitable enterprise Currently the nearest jazz club is 65 miles away 71
- Some people believe that our ever increasing use of technology significantly reduces our opportunities for human interaction Other people believe that technology provides us with new and better ways to communicate and connect with one another 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 702, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... best teacher and to be guided by them. Whereas tuition centers of those teachers whose...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, for instance, kind of, of course, in my opinion, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 12.9106741573 170% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2605.0 2235.4752809 117% => OK
No of words: 481.0 442.535393258 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.4158004158 5.05705443957 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.68313059816 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83538233458 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 215.323595506 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451143451143 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 785.7 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8354174707 60.3974514979 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.409090909 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8636363636 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.36363636364 5.21951772744 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.603772054014 0.243740707755 248% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.215837961838 0.0831039109588 260% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.12604645167 0.0758088955206 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.41755706576 0.150359130593 278% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349455294566 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.1639044944 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.26 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 100.480337079 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.7820224719 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.