Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Teachers are second to parents when it comes to learning. They hold important roles in shaping the lives of their students and in turn the quality of individuals in a society. Thus, evaluating the quality of knowledge transferred is crucial. This prompt suggests that the wages of teachers should commensurate to the academic performance of their students. I strongly disagree with this claim, and for three reasons would argue that the academic performance of a student should not be the factor on which a teacher's pay is based.
First of all, it could be argued that the qualification of a tutor equals the quality of the knowledge disseminated, however, several factors beyond the control or influence of a teacher contribute to how well a student performs academically. These factors include; Psychological and emotional factors, financial status, IQ level, social and environmental factors, and so on. For instance, the academic performance of a child whose parents are getting divorced could be affected due to the emotional trauma he/she is going through. In this case, the teacher cannot be held responsible for the poor performance of the student. Therefore it would be unfair to base a teacher's salary on a student's performance.
Secondly, it could be suggested that if the salaries of teachers are based on how well their students perform, this would motivate teachers to work harder on ensuring the academic success of their students. However, this would produce a counter result as the drive for higher pay would make teachers push their students too hard in a bid to improve their performances. This act would lead to exhaustion for these students, giving them little to no time for extracurricular activities and relaxation, and overall worsening performances.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-24 | raghavchauhan619 | 62 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | sunnyojh | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | seoul_milk | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-18 | tyagi_utkarsh1 | 58 | view |
- The following appeared in a memorandum written by the vice president of Health Naturally a small but expanding chain of stores selling health food and other health related products Our previous experience has been that our stores are most profitable in ar 83
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your position be sure to address the most compelling reaso 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 626, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...or the poor performance of the student. Therefore it would be unfair to base a teachers s...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 665, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... Therefore it would be unfair to base a teachers salary on a students performance. Seco...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 686, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...e unfair to base a teachers salary on a students performance. Secondly, it could be sug...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for instance, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 58.6224719101 63% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1494.0 2235.4752809 67% => OK
No of words: 286.0 442.535393258 65% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22377622378 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.55969084622 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99313770056 2.79657885939 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 215.323595506 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 456.3 704.065955056 65% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8650173477 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.923076923 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 23.4991977007 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.38461538462 5.21951772744 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264291189846 0.243740707755 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10613869395 0.0831039109588 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0912651432819 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19341382029 0.150359130593 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0450460110362 0.0667264976115 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 100.480337079 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.