There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.
(Wrire a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain the reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these reasons shape your position.)
Whether we should not save endangered animal or plant species could be discussed in many facets. However, saving these species, even though it requires a lot of money and jobs, can benefit to human beings.
First of all, the extinction of one particular species can lead to a food shortage for us. Inside an ecosystem, there are many food chains and the interactions between creatures are complicated. Not only is an extinction of a species no longer a part of the ecosystem, but also a predator that loses one of its preys will die. As a result, the chain reaction will destroy the whole ecosystem and people who rely on it will suffer the deficiency of food eventually.
Secondly, these species might be the key for humans to live longer and healthier. Nowadays, there are still some illnesses, such as AIDS, some chronic diseases and cancers, that cannot be cured effectively. And as a technology progresses, scientists will be able to discover a particular ingredient from a specific species and use it to create a new treatment to against those illnesses. For example, smallpox used to be the disease which could never be treated in mid century, whereas it can hardly threaten our life in this generation. Thus, we must do everything we can to protect these endangered creatures from extinction.
The argument assumes that we have the ability to save engendered creatures if we want. However, the fact is that sometimes we get nothing in return after spending money on helping these species. Nevertheless, even though we may lose a lots of money for nothing, it is worthy for us to give it a shot for saving those patients with incurable illnesses. Not to mention a great number of people will be wiped out because of the food shortage generated by ecosystem crushing down. Hence, thinking of saving these creatures as saving ourselves, is the money much more valuable than human lives?
In sum, it is reasonable for society to make extraordinary efforts to save endangered species. Otherwise, many people will suffer from a food shortage and illnesses that will eventually cause the extinction of humanity.
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.(Wrire a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the s 50
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves. 50
- It is primarily through our identification with social groups that we define ourselves.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing a 50
- There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.(Wrire a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the s 50
- The following appeared in an editorial in a business magazine. "Although the sales of Whirlwind video games have declined over the past two years, a recent survey of video-game players suggests that this sales trend is about to be reversed. The survey ask 82
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
.... Nevertheless, even though we may lose a lots of money for nothing, it is worthy for ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, thus, whereas, for example, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 58.6224719101 73% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1770.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 357.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95798319328 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77339782897 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549019607843 0.4932671777 111% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2324015082 60.3974514979 43% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 98.3333333333 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8333333333 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 5.21951772744 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148066218733 0.243740707755 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0527076177211 0.0831039109588 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0734826206402 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0975202014557 0.150359130593 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0602366436971 0.0667264976115 90% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 100.480337079 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.