Those who see their ideas through regardless of doubts or criticism others may express are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy

Ideas are a part of everyone's life. An idea pops to anyone from a homeless--plausibly, on how to lead a better life--to the president--plausibly, on how to make the country better--. Some ideas might be ephemeral and some might be perpetual. With that said, it is limpid that an idea invites doubts, criticism from others but a person who takes his ideas through the ups and downs and shapes them by taking suggestions from criticism and doubts is the person who tends to leave a lasting legacy.

Firstly, consider the example of a country's President. If the President propounds an idea, it is sure that there will be animadversion from the people as well as the opposing party. But if the idea is solid, gathering support from the majority and it guarantees a bright future for the country then there is nothing wrong in embracing the doubts and taking the ideas through. However, if the doubts and remarks make the idea tenuous then the President should make amendments in the ideas and then propound.

Additionally, consider the case of a scientist. There is plausibly no scientist whose ideas did not get the attention of the critics. Had Tesla been quite accepting the claims of Edison that direct current is better than alternating current it is certain that none of us would have had electricity anywhere--from home to workspace--. However, it would be obtruding to not acknowledge the fact that the criticisms and doubts did amend a lot of ideas which bounce back stronger.

Further, a paragon for this claim would be Elon Musk. At the introduction of SpaceX, everyone from NASA including Niel Armstrong--whom Elon considered his role model--cast doubt on commercial space flights. But, recently not only did he prove them all wrong by making a mark, but he also bagged a collaboration with NASA.

While it can be said that a person who takes his ideas through doubts and criticism from the critics, would make a mark. Constructive criticism plays a really huge role here. A person who shapes his ideas based on the doubts and criticism and gives out a masterpiece is the one who legit leaves a lasting legacy.

Votes
Average: 8.6 (3 votes)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, so, then, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 14.8657303371 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1768.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.87052341598 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93739362539 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517906336088 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.9917602533 60.3974514979 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.2222222222 118.986275619 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 10.2758426966 49% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258662037548 0.243740707755 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0786037226933 0.0831039109588 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103349278156 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151248994625 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.117312779277 0.0667264976115 176% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.