Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.

The statement agrees that without a doubt, one may thinks who would leave the lasting legacy. The lasting legacy means that one who has a perfect idea may be criticized the facts that people would think may seek through the kingdom. One with the lasting phrase lead to an ending agreement. The lasting legacy can be a gift of influential of one person and another.

People with an open kingdom could see their ideas through peoples thoughts. Throughout the Health Course, students have given an assignment that deals with letters of gratitude such as their families, teachers or anyone who is ost influencial with each other. There is a small percentage of how people were feeling leads to their happiness is low. The survey shows that the highest and lowest number of people can lead to happiness. As for their public speaking, one has given a speech who is an orator about how happiness and emotions are like (lasting for one hour). May can express their feelings endlessly.

Another supportive reason that leaving their lasting legacy talks about theories and supportive logical laws. For example, they talked about Isaac Newton which the Laws of Motion. This law dealt with whenever the action there is a reaction that the force is equal to the mass. That is a law of Physics. Last but not least the third law talks about for every reaction there is a mass that is equal and opposite direction of Force. That is the Law of motion is about which leads to their ideas. One is capable of knowing everything that comes to people's mind. There is everything that one God who changes the world may be visible to everything loves one another.

One without a doubt who is most pathetic thing they never know about. As for their supplemental agreement, one agrees to shape the position they would take advantage and know about something. Leaving a lasting legacy regardless of doubts or criticize others tend to have negative impacts. Why is it mostly serious? Well, there is a neutral fact in which negative habit comes to their way. Whenever they have a bad cycle which leads to poor attitude, they don't try to argue it that way, but to put attention to people. Don't try to be more hostile which affects criticism to others.

Their observations planted to have people's intentional feeling which can be good or bad. If it turns out bad, then there is a negative impact which tends to lose lasting legacy, At the other hand, whenever it is good, then they are ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy. Some may agree with the reasonings one without a doubt would be in contract to the gifted influence.

Votes
Average: 5.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 545, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...ble of knowing everything that comes to peoples mind. There is everything that one God ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 456, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ycle which leads to poor attitude, they dont try to argue it that way, but to put at...
^^^^
Line 7, column 519, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: Don't
...at way, but to put attention to people. Dont try to be more hostile which affects cr...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, so, then, third, well, as for, for example, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 27.0 11.3162921348 239% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2150.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 456.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7149122807 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62105577807 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34672895992 2.79657885939 84% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.480263157895 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 650.7 704.065955056 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.6037562939 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 76.7857142857 118.986275619 65% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2857142857 23.4991977007 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.32142857143 5.21951772744 44% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.401789468474 0.243740707755 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102417146456 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.103085625268 0.0758088955206 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237678789138 0.150359130593 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0813464148221 0.0667264976115 122% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.9 14.1392134831 63% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 72.16 48.8420337079 148% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.74 12.1639044944 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.