To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Each society has valuable information to spread through its people. It contains details of each individual, how they make their earnings and how they support family members. Each person has their own value because they make their contribution differently. While one works for a big or, sometimes, international company, the other's is merely handing out panflets on street to help the appearance of companies' name. However, all of this can be made not only in big centers but in small ones as well.
First of all, it is right to say that small towns have crucial outcome and they play an important role for the state. For example, Pasadena city is a small town located in California state and it provides a huge contribution not only to the state but, also to the U.S. In Pasadena is located the NASA propulsion laboratory which affords the country with information about rockets, airplanes, and space.
However, it would be argued to believe that big centers own more data than small ones, hence they would have the power and control of their people but looking at the big picture, both of them may make the input alike. It is as if small towns were coming together to form a big city. Therefore, they would provide the same outcome.
Finally, we cannot acknowledge that big cities are the major source of learning because there are small ones where we may take advantage of valuable data.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, hence, however, if, look, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 58.6224719101 44% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1152.0 2235.4752809 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 241.0 442.535393258 54% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78008298755 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47523502937 2.79657885939 89% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 215.323595506 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614107883817 0.4932671777 124% => OK
syllable_count: 367.2 704.065955056 52% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.3757287208 60.3974514979 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.727272727 118.986275619 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9090909091 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0909090909 5.21951772744 193% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.054039034984 0.243740707755 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0227768646471 0.0831039109588 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0264066832182 0.0758088955206 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0356857192165 0.150359130593 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.027616192321 0.0667264976115 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 12.1639044944 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 100.480337079 56% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.