Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Universities should not require every students to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study, for
the following reasons.
Firstly, every student would spend more time in college, which is equivalent to more money, for instance, a field
of study which should require four years, would become a five-year or more course due to the unrelated extra courses added to its
curriculum; not all students are wealthy enough to pay the extra fee incured due to the extended curriculum, some students
take loans in other to pay off their tuition and could lead to students incuring more debts.
In addition, some students view these courses as irrelevant, because they have decided to practice their field of study
as a profession and are eager and enthusiastic to join the labour market quick; making them take these unrelated causes would
be demoralizing and unnecessary for the students, since they are not going to use the knowledge from these extra courses anyway.
However, taking these extra courses would be beneficial, in the sense that it makes the students well rounded and
provides opportunity for a shift in career related to the extra courses along the line or a change in role in the organization
the students are working. For example, John, an Electrical Engineer at company xyz took some management courses during his
college days, he then intends to change from Engineering department to the management in the same organization or apply for a
management role in another company, the management related courses he took in school would come in handy to make this shift more
convenient. Although cases like these are not really a strong reason as to why students should take those extra courses outside
their field of study, because the main reason the student applied to the field of study was that he/she was going to practice
the field as a profession, so the odds to this not happening isn't as high enough as to consider including these course in their
curriculum.
In conclusion, I oppose the notion that universities should require every students to take a variety of courses outside
the student's field of study as expressed by my reasons in the paragraphs above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ent to more money, for instance, a field of study which should require four years...
^^^
Line 6, column 123, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the extended curriculum, some students take loans in other to pay off their tui...
^^^
Line 13, column 115, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t it makes the students well rounded and provides opportunity for a shift in care...
^^^
Line 16, column 126, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in the same organization or apply for a management role in another company, the ...
^^^
Line 17, column 129, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld come in handy to make this shift more convenient. Although cases like these ar...
^^^
Line 18, column 128, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... should take those extra courses outside their field of study, because the main r...
^^^
Line 20, column 62, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...sion, so the odds to this not happening isnt as high enough as to consider including...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
anyway, first, firstly, however, if, really, so, then, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 58.6224719101 96% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1875.0 2235.4752809 84% => OK
No of words: 368.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09510869565 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37987740619 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.62560192037 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475543478261 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 20.2370786517 35% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 52.0 23.0359550562 226% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 106.634029871 60.3974514979 177% => OK
Chars per sentence: 267.857142857 118.986275619 225% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 52.5714285714 23.4991977007 224% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 19.7142857143 5.21951772744 378% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 19.0 4.97078651685 382% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.530371029017 0.243740707755 218% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.343278522578 0.0831039109588 413% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.246795404662 0.0758088955206 326% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183511055079 0.150359130593 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.20540584239 0.0667264976115 308% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 28.9 14.1392134831 204% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 18.7 48.8420337079 38% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 7.92365168539 164% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 23.6 12.1743820225 194% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.19 12.1639044944 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 100.480337079 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 28.0 11.8971910112 235% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 22.8 11.2143820225 203% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.