Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Universities provide a plethora of courses for students to gain. The primary goal of the a University is to equip a student with skillset required for their field of study. Time spent on additional courses may bring down a student's performances in subjects they are truly interested in. Therefore, Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
Universities are meant to provide students with the requisite knowledge to get a deeper understanding of the course that they are interested in. At the university level most people have identified what their career path is. So, if University syllabus for a particular course, contains courses that don't pertain to the corresponding field of study then it could end up burdening the student. If the student is not well versed with the course they may have to spend additional time in understanding just because this subject is part of the syllabus. On the contrary, suppose Universities did not require students to take courses outside the field of their interest then, the student could give their all for upskilling themselves in the field of their interest.
Consider a student who knows where their passion lies, it would be so enervating for them to study subjects that aren't adding value to them in terms of their career. Such a student may stop excelling in the subjects of their interest because of the addition al time needed to familiarize themselves with the subjects outside their field. Therefore, if Universities amended their course curriculum such that it provides only the skills and knowledge necessary to excel in the corresponding field it would be far more helpful to students.
Having said that, it is extremely important to have an all round development. These additional courses may even prove to be useful. Consider. A student interested in Computer Science who took a Finance class in a college. The knowledge they gained from that class can be used in a Computer Science project related to banking and because of this finance class the student will have the ability to give more specific and precise functionality as compared to someone who is not well versed in Finance. Additionally, these extra subjects may help a student who has not decided their career path and help them explore other fields. Therefore, it also important to remember that knowledge will always help you in some way or the other so we must strive garner as much as possible.
Universities should alter their syllabus to align with need and requirement of a particular field. Although having additional knowledge can be useful, it should not be gained at the expense of subjects that pertain to the field of study. Additional subjects, may be helpful for students who are still exploring their career choices, but most people at the University level have already decided on their career path. Therefore, Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
- Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporting 16
- The following is taken from a memo from the advertising director of the Super Screen Movie Production Company According to a recent report from our marketing department during the past year fewer people attended Super Screen produced movies than in any ot 60
- Technology while apparently aimed to simplify our lives only makes our lives more complicated Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 50
- A brilliant new idea seldom comes from just one person instead ground breaking new ideas develop when people with different perspectives can meet and interact 79
- The following appeared as part of the Dean s newsletter The University of Wabash is considering a community service requirement for all undergraduate and graduate students We believe that the objective of any university is to produce well rounded and char 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'a' is left.
Suggestion: the; a
...r students to gain. The primary goal of the a University is to equip a student with s...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 299, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...articular course, contains courses that dont pertain to the corresponding field of s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 114, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...rvating for them to study subjects that arent adding value to them in terms of their ...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 748, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to garner'
Suggestion: to garner
...some way or the other so we must strive garner as much as possible. Universities sh...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, still, then, therefore, well, of course, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2539.0 2235.4752809 114% => OK
No of words: 496.0 442.535393258 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1189516129 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.71922212354 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78216967485 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 215.323595506 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.41935483871 0.4932671777 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 793.8 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1431001434 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.409090909 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5454545455 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.63636363636 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260192801776 0.243740707755 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108866090667 0.0831039109588 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.114396889804 0.0758088955206 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188921338901 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10287519519 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.1639044944 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 100.480337079 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.