As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I

Essay topics:

As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.

The speaker asserts that people gain knowledge, problems would not become comprehensible, but complex and mysterious. However, in my view, when realizing more things, people will develop more technology, which can make solved complex things. Thus, I strongly disagree with what the speaker says.

To begin with, the more knowledge we learn, the more complex things we can solve. In astronomy, gaining knowledge helps solve mysteriously. With getting more knowledge about the universe, people are more curious about unknowing things. To realize these complex things, scientists are accelerating technology development. Therefore, the complex problems will solve by scientists. Mars is a good example; Mars is such a mysterious red planet that many scientists are fascinated. To realize the geography of Mars, scientists need to invent the special camera that adapts to the environment of Mars. With this camera, people can observe the geography and living things on Mars in the camera.. Thus, people know more about Mars. In a word, when getting more knowledge, people can solve more unknowing things.

Second, progressing science makes us solving more knotty problems. Since physics brings more knowledge for us, we can realize the world. For instance, Newton, the famous English mathematician, and physicist established classical mechanics, which makes known the world of operation. Through classical mechanics, we can solve more complex problems about the motion in the world, including collision, three-dimension line motion, and rotation in the world. In brief, with more knowledge, people can solve more complex problems in the world.

Finally, in the realm of medicine, when getting more knowledge about the virus, people can solve more diseases; With realizing the more patient’s physiological traits and psychological problems, the more illnesses can solve by people. Covid-19 is a good illustration; This brutal virus has killed many people in the world. Science takes such great pains to research this virus and develop vaccines to solve the pandemic and save more people’s lives. In recently, the casualty rate has been slowing down. In sum, since knowledge makes our realizing more disease, people can solve more medical problems.

To sum up, when the more knowledge we know, the more problems, such as the unknown geography of Mars, operation of the world, and disease, we can solve. So, I disagree with the speaker.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-10-06 sahil nain 50 view
2023-09-02 graceeehgq 50 view
2022-10-19 Chaitanya02 50 view
2022-10-07 fangzr2 50 view
2022-09-18 anushashah 78 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Andy_84 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le, but complex and mysterious. However, in my view, when realizing more things, ...
^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
... and living things on Mars in the camera.. Thus, people know more about Mars. In a...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, second, so, therefore, thus, for instance, in brief, such as, in my view, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 12.9106741573 70% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2068.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 378.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.4708994709 5.05705443957 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40933352052 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75670007685 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 215.323595506 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468253968254 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 608.4 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 18.0 4.38483146067 411% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.0033598746 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.72 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.12 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27484952236 0.243740707755 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0979499516909 0.0831039109588 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.07683069235 0.0758088955206 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189777523894 0.150359130593 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0148546962126 0.0667264976115 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.85 12.1639044944 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.06 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 100.480337079 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.