As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
I partly agree with this statement as it holds true on some occasions while it isn't necessarily true in other circumstances. Whether the acquisition of knowledge renders things more mysterious or comprehensible depends on which stage of studying the learners are at.
For beginners, the accumulation of knowledge undoubtedly enable them to understand things more easily whereas it is not the case for advanced learners. Novices of all fields of study are ignorant of the basic concepts, rules, and mechanisms of how things work in the fields. To them, things in the new field are all opaque terminologies and complex phenomenon that take place out of nowhere. By acquiring knowledge, novices grasp the basic concepts of terminologies and the general mechanisms through which the seemingly mysterious phenomenon appears. As a result, they find this new field of study increasingly understandable.
However, as learners attain a considerable advancement in their fields, they become increasingly sensible to the mysteries of their fields. Unlike novices, advanced learners have not only acquired the basic framework of their fields, but also the sophisticated details underlying the framework. For example, beginners of the English literature may start by learning the predominant school of thoughts in each generation, while advanced learners delve into each generation, studying the ideas of each intellectual in each era. It is this increasing accumulation of knowledge related to details that makes advanced learners more sensible to the nuances of their fields, thereby making them more likely to detect mysteries in their fields. For instance, beginners of American literature may start by comprehending the literal meanings of a poem of Whitman and find the poem increasingly understandable as they acquire new words and grammatical rules of English. By contrast, advanced learners, with their sophisticated knowledge of English language and Whitman's ideas, are able to detect the ambiguities in Whitman's seemingly simple choice of words. For them, the more they delve into Whitman's poetry, the more confused they become.
In conclusion, novices find their fields of study increasingly comprehensible as they acquire knowledge. By contrast, when they attain certain level of advancement and is able to detect the nuances in their fields, accumulation of knowledge gives rise to confusion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-06 | sahil nain | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | graceeehgq | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-19 | Chaitanya02 | 50 | view |
| 2022-10-07 | fangzr2 | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-18 | anushashah | 78 | view |
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college Write a response in which you discuss to which extent you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you 66
- As we acquire more knowledge things do not become more comprehensible but more complex and mysterious Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take I 50
- In business education and government it is always appropriate to remain skeptical of new leaders until those leaders show that they are worthy of trust Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree disagree with the claim In developi 58
- Claim Young people s tendency to make extensive use of portable devices like smartphones and tablets has hurt their development of social skills Reason These devices encourage users to form artificial personalities and relationships online rather than ful 66
- Claim In any situation the best way to persuade other people is to present them with facts and statistics rather than with emotional arguments Reason Facts are objective so they are more persuasive than subjective appeals Write a response in which you dis 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...t holds true on some occasions while it isnt necessarily true in other circumstances...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 19.5258426966 36% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2038.0 2235.4752809 91% => OK
No of words: 365.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58356164384 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37092360658 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12318432898 2.79657885939 112% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 215.323595506 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.471232876712 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 620.1 704.065955056 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.5476833713 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.375 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8125 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.125 5.21951772744 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179336197589 0.243740707755 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0675731476252 0.0831039109588 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0616001810528 0.0758088955206 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121780912065 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0563903390301 0.0667264976115 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 14.1392134831 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 12.1639044944 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.