We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim In developing and supporting your positi

Essay topics:

We learn our most valuable lessons in life from struggling with our limitations rather than from enjoying our successes. Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.

The speaker asserts that we learn valuable lessons from difficult things rather than from success. Some things can indeed learn from success. However, difficult things make us learn more valuable lessons in life. With many aspects of reasoning, I strongly agree with the speaker.

To begin with, in academic study the things learning from obstacle has a positive influence on students, because students can know what they are ignoring. To ensure that students can study well, students have to use the pertinence of the study. Using the pertinence of the study, the study can be more efficient. For example, even though the study is nettlesome, students are willing to focus on studying to fulfill them to promote occupational development in the future. When students know what they are ignoring, they can save more time to learn more knowledge. In sum, learning from difficulty makes students effective, since they can know what they are missing.

Secondly, scientists will benefit through a difficulty, because difficulty makes scientists struggle to research the things they want to know. For many scientists, mysterious things, which are difficult for many people, are so attractive that they struggle with human limitations to solve the problems. Mars can be a suitable example. Mars is such a mysterious red planet that many scientists are fascinated by Mars. To realize the geography of Mars, scientists need to invent a special camera that adapts to the environment of Mars. With this camera, scientists can observe the geography and biology of Mars. Therefore, scientists can learn more about Mars. In a word, learning from difficulty has a health influence on the science field.

Although people can learn some things from success, the things learning from success are less than the things learning from handicap. The things learning from difficulty make a profound impression on people. After experiencing a difficulty, people can learn their lesson. For instance, COVID-19 has constantly killed the people in the world because of people's ignoring; Such a brutal virus was unprecedented that people were incapable of dealing with it in the beginning. Fortunately, the vaccination was invented successfully, causing declining the world casualty. Through this handicap, people learn a valuable lesson. In brief, the things learning from difficulty make our get a valuable lesson.

To sum up, learning from difficulty exercises a positive influence on students and scientists, since difficulty can make students know what they are ignoring, and make scientists solve more abstruse things. Even though some things can learn from success, there are more valuable things that we can learn from difficulty. Thus, I totally agree with what the speaker says.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-04-07 guozhishan 50 view
2023-09-22 Bidusik47 70 view
2023-07-17 Technoblade 70 view
2023-06-29 Ankita2904 66 view
2023-03-23 Shruti29 16 view
Essay Categories
Essays by user Andy_84 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 105, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le has a positive influence on students, because students can know what they are ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, for instance, in brief, to begin with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 14.8657303371 20% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 33.0505617978 79% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 58.6224719101 109% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2339.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 435.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37701149425 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56690854021 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71775672418 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.432183908046 0.4932671777 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 687.6 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 14.0 4.38483146067 319% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.1050220065 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.5357142857 118.986275619 70% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5357142857 23.4991977007 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.25 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.218794508633 0.243740707755 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0743935849994 0.0831039109588 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0713507647009 0.0758088955206 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149838175511 0.150359130593 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0792398022662 0.0667264976115 119% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 48.8420337079 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.97 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 100.480337079 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.8971910112 46% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.