The graph below shoes the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The graph illustrates the consumption of different types of meat in a European country for each person per week between 1979 and 2004.
The consumption of all kinds of meat had a downward trend except for chicken. Also in 1979, the usage of Chicken was about 150 grams which was equal to the consumption of Lamb approximately. In addition, Beef and Fish were eaten 220 and 55 grams per week per person respectively.
Nevertheless, in this period of time the consumption of Beef and Lamb declined considerably and reached to 101 and 52 grams respectively by taking account of some fluctuations for the usage of Beef between 1980 and 1986. Besides, the eating of Fish decreased marginally and reached to just under 50 grams. It is worth considering that the trend of the usage of Fish was the most stable one in comparison with others. Moreover, by 2004 the consumption of chicken had soared to 250 grams.
In conclusion, since 1979 although the eating of Beef, Lamb, and Fish has fallen, the usage of chicken has experienced a substantial rise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-30 | nguyenvuonglinhchi | 67 | view |
- To some people studying the past has little value in the modern world. Why do you think it is important to do so? What will be the effect if children are not taught history?Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowl 80
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing.What do you think are the main causes of crime?How can we deal with those causes? 35
- The graph and table below give information about water use worldwide and water consumption in two different countries. 70
- Countries are becoming more and more similar because people are able to buy the same products anywhere in the world Do you think this is a positive or negative development 77
- The graph below shows in percentage terms the changing patterns of domestic access to modern technology in homes in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 43
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 180 200
No. of Characters: 843 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.663 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.683 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.766 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.149 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.453 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.669 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4