The graph below shoes the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The graph illustrates the consumption of different types of meat in a European country for each person per week between 1979 and 2004.
The consumption of all kinds of meat had a downward trend except for chicken. Also in 1979, the usage of Chicken was about 150 grams which was equal to the consumption of Lamb approximately. In addition, Beef and Fish were eaten 220 and 55 grams per week per person respectively.
Nevertheless, in this period of time the consumption of Beef and Lamb declined considerably and reached to 101 and 52 grams respectively by taking account of some fluctuations for the usage of Beef between 1980 and 1986. Besides, the eating of Fish decreased marginally and reached to just under 50 grams. It is worth considering that the trend of the usage of Fish was the most stable one in comparison with others. Moreover, by 2004 the consumption of chicken had soared to 250 grams.
In conclusion, since 1979 although the eating of Beef, Lamb, and Fish has fallen, the usage of chicken has experienced a substantial rise.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-30 | nguyenvuonglinhchi | 67 | view |
- The graph shows the teleworking rates by sex in the United Kingdom between 1997 and 2005 and the rates by occupation and location of workplace in 2005 88
- You successfully passed a job interview You are expected to start on November 15 but you will not be available on that date Write a letter to your boss Explaining your situation Expressing your concern Suggesting a solution 78
- In many countries, the amount of crime is increasing.What do you think are the main causes of crime?How can we deal with those causes? 35
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods. 70
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty, and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your own opinion? 63
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 180 200
No. of Characters: 843 1000
No. of Different Words: 95 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.663 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.683 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.766 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 48 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 37 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 20 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 20 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.149 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.453 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.669 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.113 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4