The pie charts compare the expenditure of a school in the UK in three different years over a 20-year period.
It is clear that teacher's salaries made up the largest proportion of the school's spending in all three years (1981, 1991 and 2001). By contrast, insurance was the smallest cost in each year.
In 1981, 40% of the school's budget went on teacher's salaries. This figure rose to 50% in 1991, but fell again by 5% in 2001. The proportion of spending on other worker's wages fell steadily over the 20-year period, from 28% of the budget in 1981 to only 15% in 2001.
Expenditure on insurance stood at only 2% of the total in 1981, but reached 8% in 2001. Finally, the percentages for resources and furniture/equipment fluctuated. The figure for resources was highest in 1991, at 20%, and the proportion of spending on furniture and equipment reached its peak in 2001, at 23%.
- The 3 pie charts show the total school spending in all three years 1981 1991 and 2001 in the UK Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 72
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The charts below show US spending patterns between 1966 and 1996 78
- Universities should accept equal numbers of male and female students in every subject. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourists facilities.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 178, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure/equipment fluctuated. The figure for resources was highest in 1991, at 20%, a...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 734.0 965.302439024 76% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73548387097 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77086071369 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554838709677 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 193.5 283.868780488 68% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4313374095 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.5555555556 112.824112599 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2222222222 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.22222222222 5.23603664747 42% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280541019003 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115548344841 0.103423049105 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852955188311 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183845961799 0.15604864568 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623454890018 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.2329268293 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 88.06 61.2550243902 144% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.2 10.3012195122 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.13 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 26.0 40.7170731707 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.