The above diagram represents the comparison of how urban chinese spent across major categories in 1995 versus the spending habits in 2011 Summarise the information given the diagrams Write at least 150 words

Essay topics:

The above diagram represents the comparison of how urban chinese spent across major categories in 1995 versus the spending habits in 2011. Summarise the information given the diagrams. Write at least 150 words.

The two pie chart illustrates information about the difference between people living in cities of China spent cash on 8 different types of basic amenities that are required by them during 2011 and 1995.

To start with, half of the money was funded on food as compared to other 7 things that is highest among all in 1995 after 16 years the data had reduced to14% till just over a third. Secondly, cash spent on transportation and communication in final year was triple 14% as it had been a small number in initial year. Furthermore, the data of clothing observed in 1995 was 14% whereas in 2011 it noticed at 11% Also, 7% amount had been spent for household facilities in both years.

Coming to the remaining things, for educational, recreational and cultural purposes Chinese people preferred to use wealth during 1and 2011 as it was second highest in both the charts ( one in ten and more than one in ten). In terms of health services it showed slightly more than double in last year varies with first year 7% and 3%. Finally, there was minimal difference between residential and others in both years (8% and 9%) and (3% and 4%).

All in all, most of the humans consumed food as least was for others by people living in urban cities of china in given time.

Votes
Average: 6.4 (7 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2020-10-17 sangeeth28 view
2020-10-17 sangeeth28 70 view
2019-11-08 Sahejpreet singh 64 view
Essays by user Sahejpreet singh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...it was second highest in both the charts one in ten and more than one in ten. In ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, third, whereas, as for, to start with

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1043.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.61504424779 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47499832889 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 106.607317073 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606194690265 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 299.7 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 40.4086547042 43.030603864 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.375 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.25 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.25 5.23603664747 234% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0982319384902 0.215688989381 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0424859176317 0.103423049105 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0357638065943 0.0843802449381 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064060663505 0.15604864568 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023509483997 0.0819641961636 29% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.44 61.2550243902 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.