The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three countries.
The line graph depicts information about the percentage of people having age 65 and over in USA, Sweden and Japan from 1940 to 2040. The units has been calibrated in percentage.
To begin with, in 1940 5% people had age 65 or over in Japan whereas, the Sweden and USA had minimal difference about (7% and 11%). Secondly, the data of Japan dropped to less than a small number after 40 years. Thirdly, from 1980 population of people aged 65 or over remained steady till 2020 of USA whereas, in 2040 as compared to Sweden (25%) its proportion had been low (22%).
Coming to the remaining years, the figures observed from 1940 of Sweden kept in inclining as it sunk to 17% in 2020 after that, it climbed and reached at its peak point at one-quarter. Furthermore, in 2020 the population of people aged 65 or over was dete by double to one in ten as in the first year. Finally, during
Last year population boosted up nearly to 27%.
To up, in the first year the data of Sweden and USA was more than Japan as it became opposite in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-09 | Sahejpreet singh | 73 | view |
- The above diagram represents the comparison of how urban chinese spent across major categories in 1995 versus the spending habits in 2011 Summarise the information given the diagrams Write at least 150 words 64
- Some people think that the most important thing about being rich is it gives a person the opportunity to help other people. Do you agree or disagree. 56
- The debate on cash versus credit card has been going for time. Credit is still fairly a new concept within the history of finance; so many people would rather stick with paper money. According to you, which is better payment method, cash or credit. 67
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three countries. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[1]
Message: You should probably use 'have', 'haven'.
Suggestion: have; haven
... and Japan from 1940 to 2040. The units has been calibrated in percentage. To ...
^^^
Line 15, column 3, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lation boosted up nearly to 27%. To up, in the first year the data of Sweden...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, if, second, secondly, third, thirdly, whereas, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 860.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 194.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.43298969072 4.92477711251 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.34129589961 2.65546596893 88% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530927835052 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 252.0 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.9231296824 43.030603864 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.5555555556 112.824112599 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5555555556 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.88888888889 5.23603664747 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.227660655948 0.215688989381 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0962242953596 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953525386823 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120328280552 0.15604864568 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0852245196843 0.0819641961636 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.41 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.