The average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010
The pie charts below show the average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in year 2010. Overall, it can be seen differents from Japan and Malaysia, where the Transport is the biggest in Japan meanwhile in Malaysia Housing is the largest.
In 2010 Japan has a percentage 29% for Transport, the second position there was Food with 24%, and followed presence Housing whose rating was 21%, proceed by Health Care with score 6%, and closed with Other Goods And Service by presentation 20%.
In the other hand, Malaysia superior in the field of housing with 34%, next was Food with percentage 27%, followed by Transort with 26%, and 3% smaller from Japan in Health Care, and the Other Goods And Services with score 10%.
- Impact of increasing the price of petrol to traffic and pollution problem 61
- The average household expenditure in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010 56
- Effect media coverage of celebrities for children 56
- The graph of the popullation change between 1940 and 2000 in three countries in the U.S. state of oregon 56
- About people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films 22
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 602.0 965.302439024 62% => OK
No of words: 124.0 196.424390244 63% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.85483870968 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.33699396548 3.73543355544 89% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.35439677691 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 74.0 106.607317073 69% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.596774193548 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 168.3 283.868780488 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.4483250388 43.030603864 140% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.5 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.0 22.9334400587 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303370765262 0.215688989381 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.255550747252 0.103423049105 247% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.254739173612 0.0843802449381 302% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231104095078 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.23443105538 0.0819641961636 286% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.44 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.