Impact of increasing the price of petrol to traffic and pollution problem
Nowadays, it is true increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problem. I totally agree with essay because that give more advantage rather then disadvantage.
The possitive of this issue is to solve growing traffic and pollution, it is because with the increasing price of petrol will make the consumer think before buying the petrol. For example, ussually people will buy the petrol for funish necessary everyday, but when the price of petrol increase so people will diminish consumtion of petrol. As result, the pollution caused by vechile go down.
On the other hand, the increasing price of petroll certain retard the economic growth, it is because some percent of the countries income established from the sale petrol. For example, in Indonesia petrol managed by BUMN (Regionally Owned The Country) where more than 30% from countries income established by selling petrol. There fore, if the price of petrol increas and consumtion petrol go down, a little more will impact to stability of country economic.
It is important to, the pollution is first cause the global warming, so i think country should make a policy about this issue but with judgment maybe raise the public transport or find out something to subtitute for petrol with some fuel which friendly environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-11 | Phạm Duy Tân | view | |
| 2022-04-23 | Anna Forster | view | |
| 2021-10-19 | PhuongTh@o. | 78 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Lumine | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-06 | Lumine | view |
- Effect media coverage of celebrities for children 56
- The comparison of energy production in France 56
- About people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films 22
- The graph of the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country 1979 and 2004 61
- Effect of student live with their families and live away from home 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: RATHER_THEN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'than'? 'than' is used for comparisons, 'then' is an expression of time.
Suggestion: than
...because that give more advantage rather then disadvantage. The possitive of this i...
^^^^
Line 3, column 60, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is issue is to solve growing traffic and pollution, it is because with the increa...
^^
Line 3, column 248, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...ill buy the petrol for funish necessary everyday, but when the price of petrol increase ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 122, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...owth, it is because some percent of the countries income established from the sale petrol...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled as one.
Suggestion: Therefore
...s income established by selling petrol. There fore, if the price of petrol increas and con...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 73, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...n is first cause the global warming, so i think country should make a policy abou...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, may, so, then, for example, i think, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 217.0 196.424390244 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11059907834 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8380880478 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5399690967 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562211981567 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 347.4 283.868780488 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6042265253 43.030603864 134% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.222222222 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1111111111 22.9334400587 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.11111111111 5.23603664747 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420542344877 0.215688989381 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.18416402279 0.103423049105 178% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.140812945912 0.0843802449381 167% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.245042024567 0.15604864568 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1069236846 0.0819641961636 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.4140731707 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.