The graph of the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country 1979 and 2004
The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country between 1979 and 2004. Overall, it can be seen that the biggest growth was chicken.
In 1979 to 1989 the chicken increased around 50 gram per person per week from 150 gram to perhaps 200 gram, when the fish is stable from perhaps 52 gram to 51 gram, while beef experience decreased from probably 225 gram to 195 gram, and lamb is the biggest experience of decrease that from 150 gram per person per week to around 100 gram per person per week.
But in 1994 to 2004 the chicken keep growth from 200 gram to 250 gram, and fish does not move from 50 sum gram per person per week, meanwhile lamb is went down from 100 gram per person per week to around 50 gram, and the beef experience great break down from 175 gram to around 100 gram per person per week.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-10-25 | Rozulun sholihun | 61 | view |
- Impact of increasing the price of petrol to traffic and pollution problem 61
- The graph of the popullation change between 1940 and 2000 in three countries in the U.S. state of oregon 56
- About people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films 22
- The graph of the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a european country 1979 and 2004 61
- About people make friends through social sites and chat rooms 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 45, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...979 to 1989 the chicken increased around 50 gram per person per week from 150 gra...
^^
Line 3, column 50, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...o 1989 the chicken increased around 50 gram per person per week from 150 gram to pe...
^^^^
Line 3, column 84, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...d 50 gram per person per week from 150 gram to perhaps 200 gram, when the fish is s...
^^^^
Line 3, column 104, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...n per week from 150 gram to perhaps 200 gram, when the fish is stable from perhaps 5...
^^^^
Line 3, column 150, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...when the fish is stable from perhaps 52 gram to 51 gram, while beef experience decre...
^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...sh is stable from perhaps 52 gram to 51 gram, while beef experience decreased from p...
^^^^
Line 3, column 217, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... experience decreased from probably 225 gram to 195 gram, and lamb is the biggest ex...
^^^^
Line 3, column 229, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...decreased from probably 225 gram to 195 gram, and lamb is the biggest experience of ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 296, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...st experience of decrease that from 150 gram per person per week to around 100 gram ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 335, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... gram per person per week to around 100 gram per person per week. But in 1994 to 2...
^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...o 2004 the chicken keep growth from 200 gram to 250 gram, and fish does not move fro...
^^^^
Line 5, column 66, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...hicken keep growth from 200 gram to 250 gram, and fish does not move from 50 sum gra...
^^^^
Line 5, column 107, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ram, and fish does not move from 50 sum gram per person per week, meanwhile lamb is ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 170, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...k, meanwhile lamb is went down from 100 gram per person per week to around 50 gram, ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 208, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...0 gram per person per week to around 50 gram, and the beef experience great break do...
^^^^
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
...ef experience great break down from 175 gram to around 100 gram per person per week....
^^^^
Line 5, column 283, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'gram' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'grams'.
Suggestion: grams
... break down from 175 gram to around 100 gram per person per week.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 698.0 965.302439024 72% => OK
No of words: 163.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.28220858896 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57311423478 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 1.9481015251 2.65546596893 73% => OK
Unique words: 76.0 106.607317073 71% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.466257668712 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 172.8 283.868780488 61% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.1 1.45097560976 76% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 8.94146341463 45% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 124.155899981 43.030603864 289% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 174.5 112.824112599 155% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.75 22.9334400587 178% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.23603664747 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 17.0 1.69756097561 1001% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124723959709 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.213824483405 0.103423049105 207% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.342131209427 0.0843802449381 405% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209626788931 0.15604864568 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.261710763618 0.0819641961636 319% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 13.2329268293 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 73.18 61.2550243902 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.43 11.4140731707 74% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.69 8.06136585366 83% => OK
difficult_words: 11.0 40.7170731707 27% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 17.0 11.4329268293 149% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.