The bar chart demonstrates the mean cost per kilometer which is needed to importing the cloth to European Union from six particular countries in two different years.
Overall, what stands out from the graph is that the two Latin American countries showed a different trend. In the case of Argentina, the price was decreased than the previous amount, on the other hand, Brazil remained the same. In addition, there are different trends between the four Asian countries, while Japan had the same as Argentina but others had the opposite.
Regarding Latin American, the imported price was higher than the Asian countries. Among those, the cost in Argentina was high, and in 1993 the Union had to give 28 pounds per kilometer, while Brazil took only 23 pounds. In the next decade, the price climbed down to 26 for the former, whereas the latter remained the same.
Turning to Asia, in Japan, the importation cost reduced within 10 years from 15 to 13 pounds per kilometer.
The opposite picture was seen in the case of the other three countries, though China began at 10 pounds after 10 years it rose over 5 pounds, and it is similar to India. Although Bangladesh had the last in this list, its carrying cost was increased which was 2 pounds in 1993 and in the latter decade, it rose to over 5.
- More and more people are suffering from health problems caused by a modern lifestyle which cannot be treated with modern medicines Some people think that a return to traditional medicine should be encouraged To what extend do you agree 61
- Some companies spend a lot of money on scientific research and use animals for testing Many argue that this is for a just cause while others say otherwise Do the advantages of using animals in research outweigh its disadvantages 82
- The graph below shows the amount of UK investments in clean energy from 2008 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
- Some people enjoy change and they look forward to new experiences Others like their lives to stay the same and they do not change their usual habits Compare these two approaches to life Which approach do you prefer Explain why 76
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 217, Rule ID: IT_IS[7]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...h Bangladesh had the last in this list, its carrying cost was increased which was 2...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, whereas, while, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1072.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 227.0 196.424390244 116% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72246696035 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39696969515 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577092511013 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6262556276 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.2 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6 5.23603664747 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214823915156 0.215688989381 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0888376869818 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107875090395 0.0843802449381 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142611940197 0.15604864568 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.131181941334 0.0819641961636 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.