The bar chảt below shows the percentage of adults using the Internet in different age groups in UK during 2003 to 2006.
The chart illustrates how the proportion of adults who used the Internet changed in many age groups from 15-65+ years old over a period of 4 years in UK.
In general, what stands out from the graph is the age group of 15-25 registered the highest proportion during 4 years. It is also clear to see that the percentage of group of the 15-25 years old was 9 times as high as that of 65 and above.
The percentage of the 15-25 age group experienced a slight increase during 4 years, a jump of around 0.1%. A same pattern could be seen in a group of 25-35 and 65+ when a growth to 4.4% and under 0.5% respectively.
By 2006, the group of 35-45 years old had experienced a significant increase to 3.25%. In the meantime, a dramatic increase of 0.25% could be seen in the group of 45-55 years old. The figure for the age group of 55-65 increased significantly from 1.5% to 1.75% in 4 years.
- Some people say the best way to discourage smoking is to make smoking illegal in public places Other people say that this is not enough and that other measures are needed Discuss about both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people think an aging population can cause big problems Others however think the aging population has many advantages for business government and for society in general 73
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to the university Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Nowadays some individuals behave in an anti society way such as committing a crime In general it is the society to blame What causes the anti social behaviours of individuals Who should be responsible for dealing with it 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 722.0 965.302439024 75% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.29761904762 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53252650059 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 89.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.529761904762 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 195.3 283.868780488 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 20.1788874817 43.030603864 47% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.25 112.824112599 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 5.23603664747 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201734861962 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100980280454 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0546388362917 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138544678867 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0365382782165 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.0 61.2550243902 137% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.66 11.4140731707 67% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.65 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 21.0 40.7170731707 52% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.