In some countries, more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
Nowadays, an ever-increasing number of young people who are above 18, decide to live with their parents, even when they have completed their schooling and seek jobs. Despite the fact that the advantages of this problem could be pronounced, they are still outweighed by the disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are numerous short-term perks which must be considered. First, those who are still living with their parents will not consider their meals or the nutrients they add into their body. Besides that, they do not have to pay daily expenses for themselves. Secondly, parents, especially Asian ones, usually consider whether their children can truly look after their life. Hence, their children are kept at home and cared by them. This is the only way which can make parents feel pleasure. Taking Vietnam as an example, although they are not under 18, most young adults still do not do their personal hygiene and rely on the help from their parents.
On the other hand, living longer with parents brings various downsides. First, the people who follow this lifestyle will be more and more sedentary day by day. They have to depend on their parents for most daily work at home. Second, if they stay at their own house longer, they will not suffer from the feeling of having to make money. This can lead to growing stagnation and they do have no motivation and any ambition to make money. Thirdly, they do not even know how to manage their spending, which they only learn when they are isolated with their parents.
In conclusion, there are a plethora of short-term merits which young people can have when they live with their parents. However, to earn more long-term benefits, parents should be more strict to let their children out of home.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, hence, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, still, third, thirdly, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8762541806 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.32788893653 2.80592935109 83% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.535117056856 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.0020544323 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.7647058824 106.682146367 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359115354697 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12006658403 0.084324248473 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0642257077723 0.0667982634062 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.244112479416 0.151304729494 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0206632172308 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 13.0946893788 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 50.2224549098 142% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.73 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.58950901804 90% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.