Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries, while the usage of others is rapidly declining. Is this a positive or a negative development?
In recent years, some people argue that languages are used in different countries while other languages are rapidly losing. Despite the fact that there are numerous demerits, I personally believe that there are far more merits and in this essay I will give some examples to support my idea.
The main negatives of this case with regards to the disappearance of the culture which is created by language. This means that language is one of symbols which seem to impart the vibe of a nation to all people. If the usage of any language decreases significantly, such nations can be lost. For example, in Japan, the governments incentivize their citizens to use Japanese everywhere there. Not only does this help foreigners know more about Japan’s culture but it also prevents Japanese from losing in the future.
Despite the downsides of this case, I personally argue that there are numerous perks surrounding this case. People can use only one language in all countries around the world. In fact, people, nowadays, spend a huge sum of money on learning foreign languages, especially English. This means that if there is only one language which is spoken in the world, it can help people save their money for rainy days. Moreover, they can invest this purchase on learning and possessing a collection of soft skills which seem to be necessary to the future career. Moreover, it is likely to increase the foreign tourism because the difference of languages are preventing many people from going overseas. Therefore, if there is the same language in all countries, people find it easier to go abroad.
In conclusion, while there are various detrimental consequences surrounding this pitfall, I strongly believe that they are not still outweighed by the positives which can get easier for many people when travelling to other countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-05 | ctbx312 | 78 | view |
| 2022-12-12 | vishal sachdeva | 80 | view |
| 2022-11-02 | vishal sachdeva | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-04 | Albert Armin | 73 | view |
| 2021-10-17 | hnhung | 73 | view |
- The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where re 73
- The bar chart below shows the passenger kilometres traveled by different means of transport in the UK in 1990 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries more young adults continue to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Some school leavers travel or work for a period of time instead of going directly to university Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The charts below give the information about levels of education in Glasgow a city of Scotland in 2010 51
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...m to be necessary to the future career. Moreover, it is likely to increase the foreign t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oreign tourism because the difference of languages are preventing many people fro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05940594059 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68086359109 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53795379538 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.687580551 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274521291553 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861940136224 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813531862964 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166410960769 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682599826414 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 552, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Two successive sentences begin with the same adverb. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...m to be necessary to the future career. Moreover, it is likely to increase the foreign t...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 632, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oreign tourism because the difference of languages are preventing many people fro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1533.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05940594059 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68086359109 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53795379538 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.687580551 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.2 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.93333333333 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.274521291553 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0861940136224 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0813531862964 0.0667982634062 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166410960769 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682599826414 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.