The given graph illustrates how many students whose houses were or were not in the UK studied Computer Science from 2010 to 2012.
As can be seen from the chart, the British home students outnumbered the oversea countries' learners in the period of three years. Meanwhile, the gap recorded in the number of female students was bigger than the figure for male students.
The number of male local students was about two times the figure for the abroad ones of the same gender in 2010. The similar patterns were seen in the number of girls studying Computer Science in 2010 and 2011. In addition, while the number of female abroad learners witnessed a slight increase from 15 students to 20 students, the figure for native ones grew sharply by 15 people and reached the top at 45 students in 2012.
In 2011, there was a steep fall from 40 students to 25 students in the number of local learners. By contrast, a moderate growth of 3 people was recorded in the figure for the other kind of learners. The numbers of both local and abroad men learning Computer Science underwent dramatic changes of 21 and 20 people respectively in 2012. Therefore the gap between the numbers of the two kinds of learners stayed unchanged.
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK between 2010 and 2012 67
- Students perform better in school when they are rewarded rather than punished To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money making attractions Others believe it is the only way to save these traditions Discuss both sides and give your opinion 73
- The diagram shows the process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to fill land 67
- The chart below shows the process of waste paper recycling 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 335, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... 21 and 20 people respectively in 2012. Therefore the gap between the numbers of the two ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
therefore, while, in addition, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1004.0 965.302439024 104% => OK
No of words: 214.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69158878505 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82475343497 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40887737157 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504672897196 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.7240550627 43.030603864 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.4 112.824112599 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8 5.23603664747 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.314665713366 0.215688989381 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126304234159 0.103423049105 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0721696456351 0.0843802449381 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19562480184 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0654782599174 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.2329268293 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 75.54 61.2550243902 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 11.4140731707 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.7 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.