In recent decades, there have been many debates about how to preserve traditional values. While some people seem to support the idea that using traditions to attract money is the only way to enhance old values, I would argue that this can be very harmful.
On one hand, some shows or events nowadays are using the beauty of culture to make money in historical sites. First, for a long time, traditional culture has become one of the most valuable things to exploit. When tourist travel to somewhere, the first thing they will try to know is the local historical sites and traditions. This is due to the fact that each place all over the world always has its unique values of tradition and for this reason, traditions are very attractive not only to visitors but also to teenagers who want to gain knowledge about one area. Second, tourism companies are currently organizing events that allow tourists to learn about traditions. By this way, they can both improve their brands in the tourism field and gain much money.
On the other hand, using cultural traditions for commercial purposes can bring back many drawbacks. The most obvious disadvantage is that the number of events that took place in historical sites increased dramatically leading to the destruction of many relics. The managers and employees whose job is to preserve the relics cannot handle enough the problems caused by the huge amount of visitors. In many historical sites where traditional values are exploited too much, litter and smoke are unable to treat and these places are polluted heavily. In addition, the phenomenon of using traditions to make money might reduce the value of the local culture. In fact, the lack of interest to go to historical sites results from the bad quality cultural events organized by some tourism companies.
In conclusion, there have been many ways to preserve countries' cultural traditions. It is recommended that while using traditional values for commercial purposes is one way to bring these values familiar to people, this phenomenon can lead to some drawbacks.
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK between 2010 and 2012 67
- Some people prefer to live in small family units while others think it is better to live in large family groups Discuss both of views and give your opinion 73
- Students perform better in school when they are rewarded rather than punished To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in Panama City from 2010 to 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The diagram shows the process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to fill land 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... reduce the value of the local culture. In fact, the lack of interest to go to his...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... organized by some tourism companies. In conclusion, there have been many ways t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, second, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1729.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 345.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0115942029 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.57073181133 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536231884058 0.561755894193 95% => OK
syllable_count: 549.9 506.74238477 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9444927368 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0625 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5625 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6875 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.277468456935 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919502142815 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0667690603947 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.180908744206 0.151304729494 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0326695222738 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.