The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at leas

The column graph illustrate elicits the amount of students gaining the knowledge of computer science and also allocated in genders, domestic and overseas students in Britain university over three years.

Focusing on the 1st year (2010), British boy pupil learned was around 40. While, the international students comparitively half in amount. But in the next year number of non local males gradually increase. Whereas, the native students range were dropped and become 24. In this year both the local and outsider were almost same. Since, 2012 the non native boy students rosed to 39.

The year 2010, the amounts of females were less than the males was about 30 domestic students and half number than it were overseas. There were sharply growth in 2011 and till 2012 there same growth in English pupil to 45. Whereas, the international pupil were unchanged (20).

To conclude, It is analyse from the given data that with time demand of studying in the UK unversity shows upward trend by the both genders as well as native and non-native students expect the males pupil in 2011.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ritish boy pupil learned was around 40. While the international students comparitivel...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 294, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... become 24. In this year both the local as well as outsider were almost same. Since 2012 t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Since” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...l as well as outsider were almost same. Since 2012 the non native boy students rosed ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 224, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ere same growth in English pupil to 45. Whereas, the international pupil were unchanged...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 20, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'analysed'.
Suggestion: analysed
...ere unchanged 20. To conclude, It is analyse from the given data that with time dema...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
... shows upward trend by the both genders as well as native and non-native students expect t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'males'' or 'male's', 'malis's'?
Suggestion: males'; male's; malis's
...tive and non-native students expect the males pupil in 2011.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, so, well, whereas, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93989071038 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39090865688 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584699453552 0.547539520022 107% => OK
syllable_count: 268.2 283.868780488 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.4979338465 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.1818181818 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6363636364 22.9334400587 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.27272727273 5.23603664747 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111531288508 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0412029824914 0.103423049105 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300466454873 0.0843802449381 36% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0708356106498 0.15604864568 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182134055398 0.0819641961636 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.88 8.06136585366 98% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.