The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The vertical bar graph illustrate elicits the percentage of both gender of teachers and it is allocated in 6 different ways of academic option in the Britain in 2010

It is evident that in the UK, females overshadowed in pre-school and primary school teaching were 98% and 93% respectively. While males placement were hardly saw. Whereas, in the secondary school placement women and men were above and below 50% respectively.

However, the both genders of teachers were same amount of placement in college was 50%. In higher level education the men teachers placement were maximum compared to women. The amount males and females in private training institute were 57% and 53%. But inthe university the proportion of men was twofold that for women.

To sum up, the higher level of education the maximum male teachers dominated and the contrast occurred in the pre-secondary school where the female teachers were overshadowed in the UK in 2010.

Votes
Average: 6.1 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...teaching were 98% and 93% respectively. While males placement were hardly saw. Wherea...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 159, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'sawed', 'sawn', 'seen'.
Suggestion: sawed; sawn; seen
...vely. While males placement were hardly saw. Whereas, in the secondary school place...
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, whereas, while, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 797.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 155.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14193548387 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52844152537 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7793650223 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 106.607317073 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.541935483871 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 251.1 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 78.2662722697 43.030603864 182% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.625 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.375 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.375 5.23603664747 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165727807967 0.215688989381 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736381344569 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0622711660213 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116223838618 0.15604864568 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0574677861279 0.0819641961636 70% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
More content wanted.

Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.