The column graph elicits the percentage of people who eaten fast food in restaurants in the USA in 10 years. Which can be allocated in 3 different years.
Focussing on the bar chart, the English people consumed the junk food daily was less than 5% as well as others who is never interested in it too have a same amount. However, native people ate many times a week , proportion of it in 2006 (20%). Whereas, 17% eaten in 2003. But in 2013 it comparitively 1% less than 2003.
It is observed that people who eaten fast food one time a week the proportion of it maxmium. In 2003, 2006 and 2013 were 31%, 33% and 27% respectively. While, talked about a month, people who ate less than 2 times were 30% in 2003, it 5% dropped in 2006. Whereas, again it demand increase to around 33% in 2013. In addition, a group of people who prefer to few times a year were 13% in 2003 and yet, 2006 it 15% which remain stable in 2013.
Overall, people eaten every day and never consume junk food were around 5%. Whereas, the people ate once a week and month to 33%.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at leas 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 110, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... in restaurants in the USA in 10 years. Which can be allocated in 3 different years. ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 142, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to have'?
Suggestion: to have
...as others who is never interested in it too have a same amount. However, native people a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 210, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ver, native people ate many times a week , proportion of it in 2006 20%. Whereas, ...
^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... a week , proportion of it in 2006 20%. Whereas, 17% eaten in 2003. But in 2013 it comp...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 188, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely. While, talked about a month, people who ate less than 2 times were 30% in 20...
^^
Line 5, column 257, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ere 30% in 2003, it 5% dropped in 2006. Whereas, again it demand increase to around 33%...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'demands'?
Suggestion: demands
...t 5% dropped in 2006. Whereas, again it demand increase to around 33% in 2013. In addi...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: TO_TOO[2]
Message: Did you mean 'too'?
Suggestion: too
... addition, a group of people who prefer to few times a year were 13% in 2003 and y...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, well, whereas, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 855.0 965.302439024 89% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.29648241206 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.28008223536 2.65546596893 86% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542713567839 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 22.4926829268 67% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.0392403465 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.7692307692 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.3076923077 22.9334400587 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 1.69756097561 471% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.09268292683 220% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294545596394 0.215688989381 137% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108921399395 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0529061197486 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181749844935 0.15604864568 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230346688388 0.0819641961636 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 6.5 13.2329268293 49% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 90.09 61.2550243902 147% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 7.07 11.4140731707 62% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.52 8.06136585366 81% => OK
difficult_words: 27.0 40.7170731707 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.9970731707 73% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.