The set of charts illustrate elicits the Britain students asked for answer, how they describe themselves as financial planning. It should elaborate further.
Focussing on the pie graph, shows that more the 2 quarter English pupil were fairly managed there financed to 55%. While, the 4% of them admitted that they were not at all organised. From remaining 41%of native students believe that half of them were well managed (21%) and others was inverse.
However, the table data illustrate the very organised pupils that allocated age-wise. 21% of over all students were very managed. Whereas, the more than 26 years older were well planned there finances to 31%. But upto 22 years ager not very organised (17%). Between the age 23-25 years learner manage better than 22 years older. It was over all 26%.
To sum up, UK students were well managed there financed by themselves and with age experience very organised percentage increase.
- The diagrams below show UK students' responses to the question of to what extent would they describe themselves as financially organised.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The chart below shows the percentage of male and female teachers in six different types of educational setting in the UK in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 61
- The bar chart below gives information about the number of students studying Computer Science at a UK university between 2010 and 2012.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.Write at leas 78
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...e fairly managed there financed to 55%. while the 4% of them admitted that they were ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 116, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “while” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...e fairly managed there financed to 55%. while the 4% of them admitted that they were ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Whereas
...of over all students were very managed. whereas, the more than 26 years older were well...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 131, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...of over all students were very managed. whereas, the more than 26 years older were well...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, well, whereas, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 17.0 33.7804878049 50% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 790.0 965.302439024 82% => OK
No of words: 154.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.12987012987 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.52273666998 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37133042001 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 237.6 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.9718253946 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.8333333333 112.824112599 58% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.8333333333 22.9334400587 56% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 3.75 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0903396538926 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0331925202867 0.103423049105 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0446015401586 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714853912746 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0434824063095 0.0819641961636 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.1 13.2329268293 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.76 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 10.3012195122 66% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.59 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.44 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 11.4329268293 48% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.