The bar chart below shows the average duration of housework women did (unemployed, part-time employed and full-time) when compared to men who had full-time work in the UK between 1985 and 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart manifests numbers of hours allocated to household chores of four distinct demographic of men and women in various stages of employment over the period from 1985 to 2005. From an overall perspective, all subgroups experienced upward trend except for unemployed female, which leveled off after 20-year period. Nonetheless, this category still executed the largest amount of housework and was of 6 to 7 times higher than that of men with full-time occupation, who only did a stroke of work.
In 1985, jobless women spent 7 hours a day for housework, after 10 years that figure had slightly dropped to 6. 5, or thereabouts prior to rose to 7 again at the end of the period. Womankind with avocations also witnessed the same pattern with the length of times recorded at 5. 5, 4 and 6 relatively. Likewise, full-time employed female, although it took them significantly less to finish a stint of housework on a daily basis, spent maximum 2, 8 hours in 2005.
However, the amount of times of man, despite marginal increase, paled into comparison with female counterpart. From 1985 to 1995, the statistic remained stable with merely 1 hours. In 2005, that has risen to 1. 5, a comparatively tiny discrepancy.
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaurs dodos etc There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 89
- An increasing number of children have become hooked on fat food and aerated drinks that do not provide much nutrition This poor diet has led to a rise in obesity among children What are the problems that are associated with obesity in children and what st 89
- Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer while others are in favor of the 89
- Some people think that instead of preventing climate change we need to find a way to live with it To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Developments in science and technology have caused environmental problems Some people think that a simpler way of life will protect the environment while others believe that science and technology can solve environmental problems Discuss both views and gi 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, likewise, nonetheless, so, still, except for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 33.7804878049 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92718446602 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87306882277 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.674757281553 0.547539520022 123% => OK
syllable_count: 297.9 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.4173047436 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.5833333333 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 22.9334400587 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282680623167 0.215688989381 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0805621454055 0.103423049105 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749945478565 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.176119249111 0.15604864568 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0634257220534 0.0819641961636 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.02 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.