The bar chart below shows the average duration of housework women did (unemployed, part-time employed and full-time) when compared to men who had full-time work in the UK between 1985 and 2005.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant
The given chart compares the division of house duty between women (working or not working) and men with full-time employment in the UK from 1985 to 2005.
The initial impression from the chart is that during the surveyed period, the average duration of housework of men enjoyed an upswing, while that of women saw a fluctuation. Overall, unemployed women accounted for the longest hours spent on housework.
As presented in the chart, in 1985, unemployed women spent 7 hours on housework, while their nearest competitors, part-time employed women only spent over 5 hours. The hours it took full-time employed women to do housework doubled that of full-time employed men, with 2 hours and 1 hour respectively. In 1995, the average duration of house duty that women spent saw a slight decrease of 0.5 hours each, whereas men’s hours of house duty remained the same.
A different picture can be seen in 2005, when every section experienced significant rise. For women with no employment, it took them 7 hours a day to do housework, while women with part-time employment spent 6 hours. The average hours of housework of women with full-time jobs saw an enormous rose to nearly 3 hours, whereas that of men with full-time occupations only rose by 0.5 hours.
- Imprisonment Statistics 11
- The table below illustrates weekly consumption by age group of dairy products in a European country Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram details the process of making clothes from plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 66
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons wherever relevant write at least 150 words 73
- Developments in technology have brought various environmental problems Some believe that people need to live simpler lives to solve environmental problems Others however believe technology is the way to solve these problems Discuss both views and give you 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99052132701 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7005236721 2.65546596893 102% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511848341232 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 301.5 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.7225523469 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.0 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4444444444 22.9334400587 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.0 5.23603664747 38% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.375609424778 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.182391912438 0.103423049105 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1097199038 0.0843802449381 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.270864689784 0.15604864568 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0903322458821 0.0819641961636 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.2329268293 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.96 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.