The bar chart below shows the average percentage of new secondary school graduates enrolling in university in 2010, 2015, and 2020. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given bar chart provides insights into the average proportion of new middle-school graduated youngsters entering university in the three years 2010, 2015, and 2020.
Looking from an overall perspective, it can be readily apparent that Germany held the lion's share in all 3 years, while in 2010 and 2015, the figure for Angola was the lowest. Angola and Germany experienced a significant upward trend, whereas there was a moderate oscillation observed in Brazil and Malaysia.
Looking at Angola and Germany in more detail, the figure for Germany was the highest number in all 3 years, starting from about 68% in 2010 and after experiencing an increasing tendency, in 2015 and 2020, the percentage of new graduates in Germany was approximately 75% and 78%, respectively. Furthermore, in 2010, the smallest proportion of new students enrolling in university was seen in Angola, with around 42%, and then experienced an upsurge to roughly 61%.
Turning to the other nations, in 2010, Brazil had about 53% of new graduates before undergoing a fluctuation. In 2020, the figure for Brazil was the smallest number, approximately 58%. Moreover, in 2010, Malaysia was the second rank in the chart, with about 62%, and then the figure for Malaysia increased slightly to 64% in 2015. And in the final year, that figure declined insignificantly by about 1% in 2020.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-15 | hoanghihi1234 | 73 | view |
- The graphs below show the percentage of men and women aged 60 64 who were employed in four countries in 1970 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The tables below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 67
- The charts below give information about different types of waste disposed of in one country in 1960 and 2011 Summarize the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 92
- The picture shows the process of making wool Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 34
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, look, moreover, second, then, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1138.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 222.0 196.424390244 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12612612613 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90062110452 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540540540541 0.547539520022 99% => OK
syllable_count: 331.2 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.6587582517 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.444444444 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6666666667 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.77777777778 5.23603664747 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186496696464 0.215688989381 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0863461947569 0.103423049105 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0793241815274 0.0843802449381 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14055703227 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0943835892545 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.67 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.