The bar chart below shows the money spent on consumer goods in different countries.
This bar graph compares the expenditures in a thousand pounds sterling on six different consumer products such as personal stereos, tennis racquets, perfumes, CDs, toys and photographic film in four different nations.
Looking at the information in more detail, we can see that the UK residents consumed the largest amount of money in each commodity which CDs, toys and photographic film spent at around 162, 167 and 172 respectively. It is followed by France which the French consumers contributed to approximately 164 on Photographic film and just under 160 on toys and CDs. However, the spending on the other three items is the lowest compared to the other nationalities.
By contrast, unlike the UK and France which the expanding on each product were fluctuation, Germany and Italy remained steadily. Germania residents were spending a very close amount of money in each commodity at all over 145, or just under 160. Similarly, Italian people have similar expenditures in personal stereos, tennis racquets, perfumes and CDs at just over 150. It is, however, interesting to note that Italy and France have expended exactly the same amount of money in terms of toys.
Overall, it is clear that the people in the UK are more likely spending their money on consumer products, while the Germania are least likely to do so.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-27 | Thang Tran | 78 | view |
2020-01-09 | mone49 | 56 | view |
2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
2020-01-08 | uzubermy1@gmail.com | 67 | view |
2020-01-07 | Sakil | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a questionnaire that asked visitors to the Parkway Hotel how they rated the hotel s customer service The same questionnaire was given to 100 guests in the years 2005 and 2010 61
- Some people think that it is more important to plant more trees in open area which in towns and cities than build more housing To what extent do agree or disagree 80
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population who use the Internet between 1999 and 2009 in three different countries 42
- The use of the mobile phone in certain places is just as antisocial as smoking. Do you think mobile should be banned like smoking? 61
- In some countries, the criminal trials are shown on the TV and the general public can watch them. Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, look, similarly, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14678899083 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81089374449 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559633027523 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 337.5 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.7818937988 43.030603864 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.25 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.625 5.23603664747 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130386725292 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545020894621 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0457666265251 0.0843802449381 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0859867103486 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371850763669 0.0819641961636 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.2329268293 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.