The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005.
The information given from the bar chart reveals that the quantity (in thousands) of students chose to study different university subjects in 2005.
In general, it can be seen that Social Sciences and Languages were the most popular courses for females, while Sciences and Mathematics remained the most preferred subjects among boys.
In detail, around 24,000 females chose social sciences, being considerably higher than the males, at about 14,000. Also, the total (24,000) was the peak level as compared to other subjects. Next came Languages with approximately 18,000 for girls versus 2,000 for boys, making it (2,000) the least total in the year. Sciences stood at just over 20,000 (boys), which was relatively twice as much as the females at around 10,000. 4,000 was the number of females preferring Mathematics. This figure was much lower than males, with 18,000.
In contrast, the remaining subjects for both genders were not as popular as the discussed courses. The number of girls choosing Literature was a bit larger than the counterparts, namely 12,000 and 15,000. The next figure for Humanities was equal at 12,000 each for both sexes. While females dominated the arts with 9,000 versus 3,000 (boys), males surpassed Law with 10,000 and 6000 (girls) respectively.
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2010 64
- The maps show below show changes in the village from agricultural village in 1995 to a tourist destination now 54
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in contrast, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1071.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 204.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77926670891 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51104346688 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598039215686 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.8317307344 43.030603864 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.25 112.824112599 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 22.9334400587 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.23603664747 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0890489801929 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0475816536996 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0957693639865 0.0843802449381 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109460955106 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142867364706 0.0819641961636 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.2329268293 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 71.14 61.2550243902 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.87 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.