The following pie charts show the results of a survey into the most popular leisure activities in the United States of America in 1999 and 2009.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given pie graphs compare how many activitives which most favored by American over a 10-year period from 1999 to 2009.
At first glance it is clear that walking and soccer was by far the most favored activities in both years, both of which accounted for nearly half of the total propotion.
As can be seen from the graph, in both 1999 to 2009 , the majority of American choosen walking to other forms, ranging from 29% to 31 %. Soccer was ranked second also in this survey, made up 17% in 1999 and increased 1% in 2009.
On the other hand, figures for remaining types changed notable. While swimming jumped double from 9% to 18%, this patten was completely reversed in jogging, bicycling and aerobics. The percentage of people choosing three kinds in their free time is just under one-fourth percent. Going camping in the least favorite activities, almost unchanged, with averging 8,5% in both years.
It is also worth noting that yoga disappeared and replaced by weighlifiting in 2009.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-09-25 | Hisha | 73 | view |
2019-09-13 | thuytram210598 | 78 | view |
2019-09-13 | thuytram210598 | 78 | view |
2018-06-07 | Mickey Nguyen | 78 | view |
2017-09-28 | lenguyenynhitk | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 78
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. 78
- The maps show below show changes in the village from agricultural village in 1995 to a tourist destination now 54
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. 78
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 69, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... how many activitives which most favored by American over a 10-year period from 1...
^^
Line 5, column 52, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...een from the graph, in both 1999 to 2009 , the majority of American choosen walkin...
^^
Line 6, column 147, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., this patten was completely reversed in jogging, bicycling and aerobics. The per...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91715976331 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47400907548 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.692307692308 0.547539520022 126% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.5288099537 43.030603864 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7777777778 22.9334400587 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.88888888889 5.23603664747 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0942858705874 0.215688989381 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0355265859891 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377338549334 0.0843802449381 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.054505956013 0.15604864568 35% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03747867614 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.4140731707 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.