The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004.
The line graph gives information about the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat namely: chicken, beef and lamb over a period 25 year from 1979 to 2004.
It is clear from the line graph that the quatily of chicken consumed was by car highest during the period, while the others three figures witnessed a downward trends the whole time scale.
The overall for chicken consumption was an upward trend throughout in 35 year. The number of chicken started to use 150gr in 1979. Additionally, chicken consumption increased gratually until it overtook lamb and beef into 1980 and 1989. And it finished at 250gr, the one had the highest consumption rate in 2004.
On the other hand, all meat others were a downward trend during the preiod. Beef had fuctuated from 1979 to 1789 after the amount of beef fell drammtically to approximately 100gr consumed per person per week in 2004 .Similarly, Lamb consumption declined sharply over the whole timesacle. By 2004, the number of lamb at a level one third of its amount in 1979. The consumption of fish aslo decrease, but much less significantly to level 50gr in 2004 and the fish consumption was the least popular throughout the period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-24 | pateldhruv1708 | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | mary.ssherr | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-13 | manhstorm | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-02 | happyhappy | 61 | view |
- The maps show below show changes in the village from agricultural village in 1995 to a tourist destination now 54
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. 78
- The bar chart below shows the different types of accommodation chosen by the British when they went on holiday in 2010 64
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 67
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 215, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...0gr consumed per person per week in 2004 .Similarly, Lamb consumption declined sha...
^^
Line 4, column 217, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Similarly
...r consumed per person per week in 2004 .Similarly, Lamb consumption declined sharply over...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 519, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he least popular throughout the period.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, similarly, so, third, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 988.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 203.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86699507389 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64944042539 2.65546596893 100% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556650246305 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9500695088 43.030603864 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 5.23603664747 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250890414383 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101264440742 0.103423049105 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0862793135189 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165522223171 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.1090555603 0.0819641961636 133% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 13.2329268293 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.4140731707 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.