the bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company.The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers:those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and show factors affecting their work performance.

Essay topics:

the bar chart below shows the results of survey conducted by a personnel department at a major company.The survey was carried out on 2 groups of workers:those aged from 18-30 and those aged 45-60, and show factors affecting their work performance.

The given horizontal bar graph reveals the information about the company's result of survey conducted by personnel department. The group of workers from 18-30 and 45-60 shows factors which affect the work performance of the workers. The data is givrn in percentum.

It can be seen that the factors affecting work performance is given in two type of factors : internal and external. Firstly team spirit is internal factor affecting the work performance. In 18-30 it affects same as it affects to 45-60 aged group people is 62%. The other internal factors are competent boss, respect from colleagues and job satisfaction. The proportion of all these factors as same as age of people 18-30 and 45-60.

Apart from that, the poeple of age under 18-30 their work performance is affect by external factors that is change for personla development, relaxed working environment and job security is 92%, 80% and 42% respectively. Promotion prospect, work environment and money affects the people of age under 18-30.

Overall it is evident that money is a factor that affects the work performance more than any other factors. Tje workers more affected by the internal factors is team spirit.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2018-06-26 kaur meet 56 view
2018-06-26 Kaur jass 73 view
Essays by user Kaur jass :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ct the work performance of the workers. The data is givrn in percentum. It can b...
^^^
Line 5, column 74, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...e under 18-30 their work performance is affect by external factors that is change for per...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, so, apart from

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 3.97073170732 327% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 994.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15025906736 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72564920098 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528497409326 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1682389657 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.8333333333 112.824112599 73% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0833333333 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374803692671 0.215688989381 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147194744744 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0967829090333 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231529486835 0.15604864568 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.098179236642 0.0819641961636 120% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.29 11.4140731707 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.11 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.