The bar chart below shows the top ten countries for the production and consumption of electricity in 2014.
The bar chart compares how much electricity the top ten countries was produced and consumed in 2014. Overall, the production of electricity in all countries except Germany was slightly bigger than the consumption; China stood at the first place the chart in the production and consumption of electricity.
Starting with China, United States and Russia, the production and consumption of electricity were all larger than 1000 billion kWh. China produced and consumed the highest amount of electricity, with 5398 and 5322 respectively. It was followed by United States, whose statistics were 4099 and 3868, almost four times as big as Russia's(1057 and 1038). On the whole, the production and consumption of electricity in China and America far exceeded the production and consumption of electricity in Russia.
Turning now to the other seven countries, figures for the electricity production and consumption were smaller than 1000 kWh, about 936 and 856 in Japan, and about 871 and 698 in India. The data for Canada, France, and Brazil was similar at around 550 and 455. As to the data of Korea, Rep., it was the lowest in the ten countries in 2014, only about 485 and 449. It is interesting to note that the consumption of electricity in Germany(around 582) was larger than the production of electricity(about 526). In general, the difference between the production and consumption of electricity in these countries was relatively minor.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | ppatel | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | msolanki | 78 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | BIBHU KALITA | 73 | view |
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. 78
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 78
- In many countries, there are more people choosing to live by themselves than before. What are the reasons of this situation? Is it positive or negative to the development of society? 73
- Should old buildings be destroyed and replaced with modern ones? 67
- It is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reserve the trend? 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, as to, in general, on the whole
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 6.8 279% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 3.97073170732 428% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 965.302439024 125% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19396551724 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04923615218 2.65546596893 115% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504310344828 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 352.8 283.868780488 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.5863713977 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.5 112.824112599 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.2 5.23603664747 80% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.38928543837 0.215688989381 180% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.165605057124 0.103423049105 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108537179278 0.0843802449381 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.281900533919 0.15604864568 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101350424031 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.