The bar chart below shows the total number of minutes in billions of telephone calls in Australia divided into three categories from 2001 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

The bar chart shows total duration of telephone calls made in 3 different categories in Australia over the period of 8 years from 2001 to 2008.

As we can see, In all the subsequent years australians used more local telephone calls than other calls. There was gradual increase from 2001 to 2005, where it started on 72 billion minutes and reached all time high of 90 billion minutes in 2005. But it showed a decrease in the use of local calls from 2006 onwards and ended up in the exact figure of 2001 in the end.

Where as national and international calls witnessed a steady growth in terms of minutes. In 2001 Australians were only used 38 billion minutes of national and international calls, but the figures are doubled at the end of the period as 61 billion minutes in 2008.

There was significant change in the use of mobile phone minutes. Initially it was very little as 2 billion minutes showed a upward trend in the usage trend till 2005. After that the figures went up suddenly to 23 billion minutes from 12 billion minutes in the previous year and ended up in 46 billion minutes in 2008.

Votes
Average: 7.9 (5 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Whereas'?
Suggestion: Whereas
...the exact figure of 2001 in the end. Where as national and international calls witnes...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...very little as 2 billion minutes showed a upward trend in the usage trend till 20...
^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 910.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.57286432161 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44306910501 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.522613065327 0.547539520022 95% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.5917508309 43.030603864 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.111111111 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1111111111 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 5.23603664747 15% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.279429613929 0.215688989381 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118570187499 0.103423049105 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0820333638207 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194702764854 0.15604864568 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0640374356873 0.0819641961636 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.23 11.4140731707 81% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.35 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 33.0 40.7170731707 81% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.