The bar chart below shows the US’ top ten processed food export markets for last year and six years ago.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. (The photo is in the next post.)
The provided bar chart illustrates billion US$ made by processed food exported to ten high-ranked regions in last year and 6 years ago, the mentioned destinations were Canada, Mexico, The European Union, Japan, China, South Korea, Philippines, Australia, Hong Kong and rest of the world.
Overall, within the span of 5 years, a significant increase is seen for all ten categories. The highest money contribution was for Canada in both years while rest of the world allocated the second highest share of gained budget. Alternatively, Hong Kong and Australia stood that same amount 6 years ago and both marginally improved as lowest categories.
6 years ago, Canada acquired 9.3 billion US$ and later it experienced around 39 billion US$ surge maintaining the top country in terms of marketing in last year. If an analogy was made rest of the world's category would have 3 billion US$ Lesser amount 6 years ago and also it was relatively around 2.2 billion lower than Canada in previous year. The rest significant contributors in a consecutive high-ranked order in both chronological spans were Mexico, The European Union and Japan which experienced approximately 2.1, 1.8 and 01 increments, respectively.
On the other hand, Australia and Hong Kong were both having a static share of a 0.3 billion US$ 6 years ago then the former country turned 0.8 billion and the latter one slightly increased reaching 1 billion. Philippine would also stand in mid-ranged countries as it had a 0.7 billion enhancement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-05-01 | Sarina2021 | 78 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 contribution as of India s GDP summarize the information and make comparisons where relevant 83
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- It is more important for school children to learn about their local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement 78
- Some people claim that not enough of the waste from homes is recycled They say that the only way to increase recycling is for governments to make it a legal requirement To what extent do you think laws are needed to make people recycle more of their waste 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The provided bar chart illustrates billi...
^^^
Line 1, column 39, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
The provided bar chart illustrates billion US$ made by processed food exported to ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...alia, Hong Kong and rest of the world. Overall, within the span of 5 years, a s...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ginally improved as lowest categories. 6 years ago, Canada acquired 9.3 billion...
^^^
Line 3, column 200, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...ear. If an analogy was made rest of the worlds category would have 3 billion US$ Lesse...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
..., 1.8 and 01 increments, respectively. On the other hand, Australia and Hong...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, second, so, then, while, as for, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1263.0 965.302439024 131% => OK
No of words: 246.0 196.424390244 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13414634146 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96035189615 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9306687779 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 106.607317073 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589430894309 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 283.868780488 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.7419150745 43.030603864 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.333333333 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.3333333333 22.9334400587 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.22222222222 5.23603664747 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208822707847 0.215688989381 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.091882140317 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0785056656693 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140251395778 0.15604864568 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664976004947 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.53 61.2550243902 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.6 10.3012195122 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.06136585366 114% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 40.7170731707 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.4329268293 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.