The graph below shows the annual visitor spend for visitors to New Zealand from 5 countries for the years 1996 to 2014.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given line graph illustrates the amount of expenditure visitors spent in New Zealand from 1996 until 2014. In addition, the expenditure is marked as NZ$ and visitors were from five countries including Australia, USA, UK, Japan and China.
Overall, there were significant growth in all categories excluding Japan and China which both had a slight increase. It needs to be noted that all five categories had their own fluctuations.
Australia had actually the highest expenditure in all time span starting from approximately 1,000 NZ$ reaching around 2,000 NZ$ in 1996 and 2014, respectively. China was almost the lowest category in general. However, during 2001 till 2005 the lowest expenditure was for UK which reached the lowest point at around 200 N2$ in 2002.
It also should be mentioned that although all five countries jumped in terms of expenditure, the last amounts being shown in 2014 were not the highest ones during their trajectory, whereas Japan until 2002 had a significant skyrocket peaking at 9100 NS$, subsequently it gained a downward trend turning 500 NZ$ in 2014. The deterioration in USA expenditure was also noticeable during 2011 to 2014 which it experienced a drop around 600 NS$.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-24 | Sarina2021 | 92 | view |
- The Statement should reflect your ability to communicate clearly and provide an overview of your academic and research background your professional and career goals and your area of research interest Additionally the Statement should describe a rationale
- The bar chart below shows the sector contributions to India s gross domestic product from 1960 to 2000 contribution as of India s GDP summarize the information and make comparisons where relevant 83
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museum outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The Statement should reflect your ability to communicate clearly and provide an overview of your academic and research background your professional and career goals and your area of research interest Additionally the Statement should describe a rationale
- Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future such as those related to science and technology Discuss both these views and 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given line graph illustrates the amo...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...Australia, USA, UK, Japan and China. Overall, there were significant growth i...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tegories had their own fluctuations. Australia had actually the highest expen...
^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...est point at around 200 N2$ in 2002. It also should be mentioned that althoug...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, however, if, so, whereas, as for, in addition, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1023.0 965.302439024 106% => OK
No of words: 197.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.19289340102 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74642080493 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84192340507 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 121.0 106.607317073 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61421319797 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 288.9 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 72.4292758489 43.030603864 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8888888889 22.9334400587 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.11111111111 5.23603664747 155% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.126761625207 0.215688989381 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583251373171 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749190582493 0.0843802449381 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0851892097749 0.15604864568 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874336425978 0.0819641961636 107% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 40.7170731707 123% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.