The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018.
The bar graph compares families weekly spending in a country between 1968 to 2018.
Overall, households weekly spending in 1968 were mainly on basic need such as food, housing, and clothing and footware with food percentage was higher than both housing and clothing while families in 2018 weekly spending were food, housing and leisure with the percentage of spending on food had a noticeable reduction. Categories such as housing,transport and leisure experienced a sharp increase in 2018 while clothing and footware had decreased in 2018.
In 1968, 35 percent of household weekly income was spent on food, this figures had decreased significantly in 2018 from 35 percent to around 16 percent. Housing, transport and leisure had around 10 percent, 8 percent, and 9 percent individually. These percentage had grown sharply in 2018 with around 18 percent in Housing, about 14 percent in Transport, and around 22 percent in Leisure.
Fuel and power, and Personal goods had around 6 percent and 7 percent respectively in 1968, but in 2018 these figures had experience a reduction with both had around 4 percent each. Household goods remained the same both in 1968 and 2018 with around 7 percent respectively.
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main feature and make comparisons where relevant 56
- The maps illustrate an industrial area in Norbiton in the present day compared with plans for future development of the site 67
- At present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of old people Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Studying with a group of students in a classroom is more beneficial than learning online at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones Why is this the case Do you think this is a positive or negative development 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 346, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , transport
...le reduction. Categories such as housing,transport and leisure experienced a sharp increas...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 246, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this percentage' or 'These percentages'?
Suggestion: This percentage; These percentages
... 8 percent, and 9 percent individually. These percentage had grown sharply in 2018 with around 1...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 123, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'experienced'.
Suggestion: experienced
... in 1968, but in 2018 these figures had experience a reduction with both had around 4 perc...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1015.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 196.0 196.424390244 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17857142857 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.74165738677 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86719714185 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469387755102 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 278.1 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.482926829268 1035% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.8086650412 43.030603864 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.875 112.824112599 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 22.9334400587 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 5.23603664747 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193208451332 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117319385399 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0966203422464 0.0843802449381 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165982828944 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103765424452 0.0819641961636 127% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.2329268293 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.06 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.