The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018.
The given bar chart illustrates the weekly income spent by families in a nation in two different years. overall, the amount of money spent on food made up the largest proportion of total weekly income, while in 2018, families’ income was mostly spent on leisure. There was a decrease in the amount of money spent on food, fuel and power, personal goods, clothing, and footwear. In contrast, housing, transport, and leisure saw an increase in income spent on them.
we can see that, in 1968, the percentage of money paid out for food accounted for 35% of total weekly income, which is also the largest proportion. expenses such as housing, clothing and footwear were spent the same ( 10% for each of them) every week. the rest of the income earned each week was spent on personal goods, transport, leisure, fuel and power, there were not huge expenses since they all just made up for under 10% of total income.
it is interesting to note that, 50 years later, there was a rapid change in the way that families spent their weekly income. there was still about 17% of income spent on food, which was two times lower than in 1968. in contrast, the amount of income spent on leisure increased significantly (accounting for roughly a quarter of weekly income), followed by housing, whose figure made up almost 20%. additionally, the amount of weekly income spent on transport increase by 8% ( from 8% to 16%). income that paid out for fuel and power, clothing and footwear, and personal goods were lower, each of them just accounted for almost 5% of weekly income, an insignificant proportion. household goods were the only expense on which families spent unchanged.
- Many companies today sponsor sports as a way of advertising themselves Some people think that this is a good thing for the world of sports Others think this has disadvantages Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- The maps show a coastal area before and after development 78
- it is important for people to take risks both in their professional lives and personal lives do you think the advantages of taking risks outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of government spending on roads and transport in 4 countries in the years 1990 1995 2000 2005 67
- The table below shows the percentage of first year students who gave very good rating to the resources provided by the college for three courses Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given bar chart illustrates the week...
^^
Line 1, column 107, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Overall
...ies in a nation in two different years. overall, the amount of money spent on food made...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...w an increase in income spent on them. we can see that, in 1968, the percentage...
^^
Line 2, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: We
...an increase in income spent on them. we can see that, in 1968, the percentage o...
^^
Line 2, column 150, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Expenses
..., which is also the largest proportion. expenses such as housing, clothing and footwear ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 217, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lothing and footwear were spent the same 10% for each of them every week. the res...
^^
Line 2, column 252, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: The
... same 10% for each of them every week. the rest of the income earned each week was...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...made up for under 10% of total income. it is interesting to note that, 50 years...
^^
Line 3, column 3, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...de up for under 10% of total income. it is interesting to note that, 50 years l...
^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...hat families spent their weekly income. there was still about 17% of income spent on ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 218, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...which was two times lower than in 1968. in contrast, the amount of income spent on...
^^
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Additionally
...using, whose figure made up almost 20%. additionally, the amount of weekly income spent on t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 473, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...income spent on transport increase by 8% from 8% to 16%. income that paid out for...
^^
Line 3, column 491, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Income
...ansport increase by 8% from 8% to 16%. income that paid out for fuel and power, cloth...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 675, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Household
...ly income, an insignificant proportion. household goods were the only expense on which fa...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, still, while, in contrast, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 7.0 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 965.302439024 142% => OK
No of words: 285.0 196.424390244 145% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82105263158 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46348775719 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 134.0 106.607317073 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.470175438596 0.547539520022 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 408.6 283.868780488 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.5754092556 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.692307692 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.69230769231 5.23603664747 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 15.0 1.69756097561 884% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.13902439024 263% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2619525876 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119552403001 0.103423049105 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0697566448556 0.0843802449381 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202929057928 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0703828981831 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.2329268293 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.23 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.