The bar chart provides information about how families in a country spent weekly income in both 1968 and in 2018.
The given column chart illustrates the total proportion of weekly income consumed by populations from a which nation in different sectors in 1968 and 2018.
Overall, it can be deemed that most of the households spent money in 1968 for food while many preferred leisure in 2018.
First of all, a huge number of Families 35% were used savings by in 1968 for food when almost 17 percent were interested in 2018. In 1968, no more than 10 percent people spent income in housing sector
while it was increased gradually by approximately 19% in 2018. Moreover, 6 percent public used money for full and power in 1968 which was decreased rapidly by just under the 5 percent. The line of clothing and footwear was climbed 10% in 1968 and it was dropped by 5% in 2018. In 1968 and 2018, the percentage of household goods were similar by 8%. Furthermore, no more than 9%, individuals consumed their income in three different sectors which are personal goods, transport and leisure in 1968 when people were used by 4%, 14% and 22% respectively in 2018.
- Although you have never formally studied computing you have always been interested in computers You have just read about a computer course that really interests you but it is only for people who have completed an elementary course Write a letter to the co 56
- In many countries people are now living longer than ever before Some people say an ageing population creates problems for governments Other people think there are benefits if society has more elderly people To what extent do the advantages of having an ag 67
- The charts below give information about USA marriage and divorce rates between 1970 and 2000 and the marital status of adult Americans in two of the years 73
- Improvements in health education and trade are essential for the development of poorer nations However the governments of richer nations should take more responsibility for helping the poorer nations in such areas To what extent do you agree or disagree w 84
- Nowadays there are more opportunities for women than there were in the past Some people think this situation caused more problems than it has solved What are your opinion on this 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt people spent income in housing sector while it was increased gradually by appr...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 375, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...similar by 8%. Furthermore, no more than 9%, individuals consumed their income in...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 868.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74316939891 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5486165396 2.65546596893 96% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 106.607317073 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562841530055 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 243.0 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1918358845 43.030603864 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.5 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.125 5.23603664747 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22398146423 0.215688989381 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108963261932 0.103423049105 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0444925746857 0.0843802449381 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.149984253832 0.15604864568 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308114124576 0.0819641961636 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.