The bar chart shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union.The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport.

Essay topics:

The bar chart shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union.
The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport.

These charts gives information about in European Union funds being spent and CO2 emission on different forms of transport. The data perents in the percentage and KM. Overall, it can be seen that the highest percentage and KM was air in the bar chart and roads in the pie chart while the smallest percentage and KM was coaches in the bar chart and intermodal, inland waterway, and airports in the pie chart.
​In the one hand in bar chart, air got above 350KM which the highest category. Than, followed by passenger which was approximately 100KM to 150KM was the second highest category. Thereafter, the slighlest category which stood at under 100KM.
​On the other hand in pie chart, roads gained obviously 52% which the biggest percentage. Next, railways which market at patenly 31% was the second biggest percentage. Continue, public transport which was standing at one third of the railways’s percentage was the third biggest percentage. However, the smallest percentage was intermodal, inland waterway, ports, airports, and unknown which was standing at above one fourth of the public transport’s pencentage.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-07-22 evansalulinggi 73 view
>>> More users practiced this topic >>>
Essay Categories
IELTS Writing Task I - IELTS Academic

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rcentage and KM. Overall, it can be seen that the highest percentage and KM was a...
^^
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...above 350KM which the highest category. Than, followed by passenger which was approx...
^^^^
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Than” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...above 350KM which the highest category. Than, followed by passenger which was approx...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, second, third, while, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 33.7804878049 71% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 949.0 965.302439024 98% => OK
No of words: 180.0 196.424390244 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27222222222 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.66284150148 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85360395913 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 264.6 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.9378226248 43.030603864 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.9 112.824112599 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.2 5.23603664747 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.257998440368 0.215688989381 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110750037569 0.103423049105 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.165211204448 0.0843802449381 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189687982265 0.15604864568 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.190471853571 0.0819641961636 232% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 61.2550243902 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.99 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.78 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.