The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010.
These pie charts given information about the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. The data presents in percentage. Overall, it can be seen that the most increase was food while the most decrease trend was housing.
In the one hand in 1950, housing got 72.1% wich the biggest category. Followed by food which was 11.2% was the second highest. Than it was followed by education which stood at 6.6% was the third biggest. Next it was followed by other which was standing at 4.4% was the fourth biggest. Then it was followed by transportation wich noted at 3.3% was the fifth biggest. Finally, the most lowest was health care which market at 2.4%.
On the other hand in 2010, there had some household expenditures which got increasing was food which was 22.8% wich the biggest category. Followed by other which stood at 14.8% was the second biggest. Than followed by transportation which was standing at 10.7% was the third biggest. Finally, the last was health care which market at 2.1%. In contrast, there had some which got decreasing trend was housing which noted at 50.1% which the smallest category. Then followed by education which counted at 0.3% was the second smallest.
- The charts below show UK and USA energy consumption in 2000 and 2006. 67
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 61
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010. 73
- The bar chart shows CO2 emissions for different forms of transport in the European Union.The pie chart shows the percentage of European Union funds being spent on different forms of transport. 73
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 90, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rage household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010. The data presents in p...
^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...which was 11.2% was the second highest. Than it was followed by education which stoo...
^^^^
Line 2, column 128, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Than” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...which was 11.2% was the second highest. Than it was followed by education which stoo...
^^^^
Line 2, column 380, Rule ID: MOST_SUPERLATIVE[1]
Message: Use only 'lowest' (without 'most') when you use the superlative.
Suggestion: lowest
....3% was the fifth biggest. Finally, the most lowest was health care which market at 2.4%. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: SENT_START_THEM[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Then'?
Suggestion: Then
...Followed by other which stood at 14.8%. Than followed by transportation which was st...
^^^^
Line 3, column 153, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Than” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...Followed by other which stood at 14.8%. Than followed by transportation which was st...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, second, so, then, third, while, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 3.15609756098 412% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 904.0 965.302439024 94% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88648648649 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4841351985 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.475675675676 0.547539520022 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 8.94146341463 168% => OK
Sentence length: 12.0 22.4926829268 53% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 23.502623967 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 60.2666666667 112.824112599 53% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 12.3333333333 22.9334400587 54% => More words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 1.69756097561 353% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.09268292683 244% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0912793567057 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050730034441 0.103423049105 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145329109867 0.0843802449381 172% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119258047345 0.15604864568 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.132213802676 0.0819641961636 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 7.8 13.2329268293 59% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 84.68 61.2550243902 138% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 4.4 10.3012195122 43% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 10.19 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.62 8.06136585366 82% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.4329268293 52% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 6.8 10.9970731707 62% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.