The bar graph illustrates how the young in Europe expect five different life aspects to change overr the following two decades.
Overall, the majority of young individuals polled articipated that communication between people would become better after 20 years, whereas the opposite was true in the cases of the other surveyed areas. It is also noteworthy that the difference between youngster's expectation about health and water quality was negilible.
Regarding people health and communication, sightly above 40% and 60% of young people in the survey predicted. that these aspects would see improvement, respectively. This mean that more than young repspondent forecast that the former is going to worsen in comparison with the latter.
Turning to the other categoris, there is a small gap between young people's responses regarding the quality of water and food, with 60% and roughly 52% of them claiming that these areas wil degenerate, in that order. Air quality, meanwhile, recieved the worst outlook, as nearly four-fifths of the young belived that it would detoriate.
- Schools should focus on academic success and passing examinations Skills such as cookery dressmaking and woodwork should not be taught at school as it is better to learn these from family and friends To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 78
- The table below gives information about students studying in six departments in an Australian university in 2011 78
- In some countries celebrities complain about the way the media publicize their private lives Some people say that they should accept it as part of their fame To what extent 89
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 111, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: That
...f young people in the survey predicted. that these aspects would see improvement, re...
^^^^
Line 5, column 253, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ecast that the former is going to worsen in comparison with the latter. Turnin...
^^
Line 7, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...water and food, with 60% and roughly 52% of them claiming that these areas wil de...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, regarding, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 1.00243902439 299% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 915.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 168.0 196.424390244 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44642857143 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60020574368 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79388682151 2.65546596893 105% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.9015273279 43.030603864 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.375 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.625 5.23603664747 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234116493098 0.215688989381 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0876044430573 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0606643455456 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136333191194 0.15604864568 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0451133015803 0.0819641961636 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.2329268293 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 61.2550243902 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 11.4140731707 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.4329268293 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.