Celebrities are generally followed by media people obtain their photographs and videos to upload on internet, which is not liked by them. Although there is one set of society that supports this soft of behavior shown by press, i whole heartedly disregard this ideology and believe that it is not appropriate to capture someone's picture to make them on air, i will eleborate furthermore in details about it in following paragraphs.
The primary reason of not supporting this trend is that everyon has a right to maintain secrecy in life. In other words, each individuals has a private life inrespective of one's level of popularity in society, where one can live as an ordinary individual. For instance, most of the time, new channels boardcast about the clips shared by popular personalities on their social media accounts, without their consent. Henceforth, anyone can mind, if someone publicizes their personal information, just because of it is availibility and accessibility on social media platforms.
Moreover, when media reporters try to chase them everywhere, it disturbs their mental peace. After obtaining data about famous person from radio, television and other information sources, general public ussually try to follow them too, which is cannot be justified for celebrities, as they may find hard to spend some personal time with their families. To exemlify, when celebrities take some time off from their work to go on vacation, news media usually reaches there too, just to capture their personal movements o get some views likes and comments on their channel. This kind of act may distress celebrities more,as it can break their families.
In conclusion, an abovementioned facts substaintiates that inresponsible behavior of media could affect celebrities life and mental health adversely. It is the duty of the government of any country to regulate this kind of actions. Otherwise, situation could be worse in future.
- The bar chart shows expectation to change of European young people in the next 20 years in 5 different areas 89
- The graph below shows the rate of smoking per 1000 people in Someland from 1960 to 2000 78
- Schools should focus on academic success and passing examinations Skills such as cookery dressmaking and woodwork should not be taught at school as it is better to learn these from family and friends To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some people think that employers should not care about the way their employees dress because what matters is the quality of their work To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- The table below gives information about students studying in six departments in an Australian university in 2011 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 358, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...e someones picture to make them on air, i will eleborate furthermore in details a...
^
Line 3, column 174, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...uals has a private life inrespective of ones level of popularity in society, where o...
^^^^
Line 5, column 189, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...levision and other information sources, general public ussually try to follow them too, which ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 617, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , as
...ind of act may distress celebrities more,as it can break their families. In conc...
^^^
Line 7, column 34, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'fact'?
Suggestion: fact
...es. In conclusion, an abovementioned facts substaintiates that inresponsible behav...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ns. Otherwise, situation could be worse in future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, hence, if, may, moreover, so, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1636.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31168831169 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9360560331 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62012987013 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.10420841683 333% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 69.5319942534 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.846153846 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6923076923 20.7667163134 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272888971747 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0873938170097 0.084324248473 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0682904065353 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14008307273 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0763268939689 0.056905535591 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.49 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.