The bar chart shows the number of volunteers in New Zealand who helped in sports organizations in 2010. The pie chart illustrates the number of volunteers doing different types of jobs for that same period. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar graph compares the proportions of New Zealand volunteers by their current family types. The pie chart provides information about how many volunteers were allocated to in charge different roles in sport organizations in 2010.
Overall, the couples with dependent children took up a major part of the volunteer number, meanwhile, those who have kids but no partner were the lowest. Most people would support as a coach, instructor or teacher, and only a smart number work in medical support.
There is no clear connection between the graphs. About half of the volunteers were couples with small child, and this number was almost doubled the one with no children with 26.9%. Single parent, as the lowest group in term of participant, contributed to the total number of volunteer about 10%, 2% lower than other households group.
Regarding the pie chart, a large majority of people took the role of instructors and administrator, with 206.000 people and 158,600 people respectively. Followed were the jobs that required volunteers to work on the actual field. To be precise, for scorer or timekeeper roles, there were 128.000 volunteers while the number of referee and umpire was slightly lower with 98.300 people. Medical support and others was the lowest in term of supporters, only 62.700.
- The bar chart shows the number of volunteers in New Zealand who helped in sports organizations in 2010 The pie chart illustrates the number of volunteers doing different types of jobs for that same period Summarize the information by selecting and reporti 84
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some people believe that it would be beneficial if employees worked three or four days per week rather than five or six days Why is this Give reasons for your answers and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience 84
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1990521327 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68600406195 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620853080569 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0057387529 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255441439331 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921961769318 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739448922873 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165721260663 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892786063788 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1097.0 965.302439024 114% => OK
No of words: 211.0 196.424390244 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1990521327 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81127787577 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68600406195 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 106.607317073 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620853080569 0.547539520022 113% => OK
syllable_count: 314.1 283.868780488 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.0057387529 43.030603864 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.7272727273 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1818181818 22.9334400587 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.27272727273 5.23603664747 43% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.255441439331 0.215688989381 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0921961769318 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739448922873 0.0843802449381 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165721260663 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892786063788 0.0819641961636 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.