The bar chart shows the number of volunteers in New Zealand who helped in sports organizations in 2010. The pie chart illustrates the number of volunteers doing different types of jobs for that same period. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides information about the percentage of four different types of volunteers, who took a part in New Zealand’s sports organizations in 2010, based on their household types. The pie chart indicates information about five main roles, of which those volunteers were in charge.
Overall, no correlation was shown in the two charts. Volunteer, who is couple with dependent children, was a major part of these events. A large proportion of volunteers played as a coach, instructor or teacher, meanwhile, medical support and other role were the lowest in number.
It is noticeable that about half of the volunteers were couples with at least one young kid, while those whose children were not dependent on them took part to roughly 26,9% out of all volunteers. In contrast, lone people had the lowest figure with just one-fifth the number of the couple with dependent child group. The Other household was slightly higher than those single parents, with 12.4%.
Regarding the table chart, the role with the highest number of volunteers was coach, instructor or teacher, with 206,000 people, which was almost double for referee and umpire jobs. The Committee member or administrator was the second-highest and came after it was scorer or timekeeper, with 158,600 and 128,000 people respectively. Finally, with 62,700 volunteers, medical support and other roles were the lowest in number, approximately four times smaller than the coach or teacher role.
- the diagram shows the process in which a tourist resort can develop and grow 86
- How can the government make sure that people save enough money to live on when they are old 95
- The diagram shows the process for labelling shellfish for the international market Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 82
- Some young people look forward to a year of travelling a gap year before they begin work or university and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons For others this is an expensive waste of time Discuss both view and give opinion 73
- Some countries import a large amount of food from others To what extent is this a positive or negative 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 264, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: lowest
...medical support and other role were the lowest in number. It is noticeable that about half of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 408, Rule ID: ADJECTIVE_IN_ATTRIBUTE[1]
Message: A more concise phrase may lose no meaning and sound more powerful.
Suggestion: lowest
...edical support and other roles were the lowest in number, approximately four times smaller than ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, if, regarding, second, while, at least, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 5.60731707317 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1238.0 965.302439024 128% => OK
No of words: 234.0 196.424390244 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2905982906 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76933628584 2.65546596893 104% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 106.607317073 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594017094017 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 283.868780488 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.6205005805 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.545454545 112.824112599 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2727272727 22.9334400587 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.45454545455 5.23603664747 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.188981949805 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0754394982062 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0857393600457 0.0843802449381 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134340359292 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.112286643437 0.0819641961636 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 11.4140731707 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 40.7170731707 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.